2026-01-18 18:35:50

Billions' decentralized identity verification (DID) login solution will hold a builder-exclusive sharing session on January 26th. This solution breaks through the limitations of traditional login models—users do not need passwords, do not rely on centralized identity databases, and the backend does not store any personal information, making privacy protection a industry-leading standard.

The most innovative aspect is the introduction of a human verification mechanism to ensure the security and authenticity of DID logins. Compared to centralized login solutions like Google, this privacy-first design allows users to have full control over their identity data. For developers building Web3 applications, this is a technical direction worth exploring in depth.

Seats are limited and only open to builders.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

7 Likes

Reward
7
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

AirdropHunterKing

· 3h ago

Oh, we need to take a close look at this DID login. The passwordless solution sounds appealing, but I need to check how the human verification mechanism is implemented—wait, I should check the wallet address, no, I mean check the contract logic. --- Another privacy-first new feature, a builder's special? I feel like it's just another scheme to cut the leeks, but if the gas fees are cheap, I might give it a try. --- Wait, if the backend doesn't store information, then who verifies the data? How do they prevent witch attacks? We, the degens, need to be cautious and not get caught up in another engagement scam. --- January 26th, right? Let's mark it in advance. These DID events usually have hidden investment eligibility, and limited spots are the real highlight. --- The passwordless approach sounds secure, but the real question is—how do they ensure there are no bugs in the human verification part? I don't want to go through another rug pull like last time.

View OriginalReply0

DEXRobinHood

· 3h ago

Password-free login? Sounds good, this is the way Web3 should be --- Prioritizing privacy is really worth noting, just not storing personal data alone makes it worthwhile to research --- How is the human verification mechanism implemented? That's the key, otherwise it's still a disguised centralized system --- Limited spots again, I’m too familiar with this routine. Truly valuable insights still require digging into the code myself --- Finally someone is seriously working on login. Google's approach should have been phased out long ago --- January 26th... Let’s see if I can squeeze in, the DID direction is indeed worth paying attention to --- Having full control over identity data sounds great, but whether it’s practical to use remains a question --- Is it helpful for developers? That’s the focus, not just theoretical discussions

View OriginalReply0

OvertimeSquid

· 3h ago

Passwordless login? Sounds great, but I'm still a bit confused about how human verification mechanisms are actually implemented. --- Achieving industry-leading privacy protection—just ask whether the data flow is truly transparent. --- Special session for builders... Is this another code word for cutting leeks? Haha. --- The backend doesn't store personal information, so where does the verification logic reside? This needs a good look. --- I'm genuinely interested, but can you explain how human verification can't be bypassed? --- Web3 and DID again—whether to make money or advance technology, better to clarify first. --- Limited spots for this session—this marketing tactic is really... overused. --- Controlling identity data is great, but the key is whether users trust this system themselves. --- Google has been hacked this badly—can decentralized solutions really compare? --- I might be working overtime on January 26th. Is there a recorded session?

View OriginalReply0

just_another_fish

· 3h ago

Wow, passwordless login is really amazing. Finally, someone has understood privacy issues. DID feels like what Web3 should be... but I'm a bit curious about how the human verification mechanism actually works. Once again, limited spots... Builder's exclusive session. As a non-developer, am I being kept out again? Backend with zero storage—that's true control. Honestly, Google's system should have been phased out long ago. I'm curious to see which is more impressive: DID with Lens or others...

View OriginalReply0

LayerHopper

· 3h ago

Passwordless login sounds good, but how exactly does the human verification mechanism work? --- Prioritizing privacy and not storing data again—seems like every project claims this, but the authenticity remains to be verified. --- January 26th... The builder's exclusive session sounds a bit elitist; regular users won't have a chance? --- DID is definitely something Web3 developers should understand, but can it surpass Google's convenience? That’s the key. --- The human verification mechanism sounds complicated; could it actually reduce user experience? --- Is leading the industry in privacy protection just boast, or is it truly effective? It depends on the actual performance after launch. --- Limited quotas—this marketing tactic is so outdated. Truly innovative products don't need to do this at all. --- Passwordless is indeed a pain point, but how is security ensured? I didn't catch that clearly.

View OriginalReply0