Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Middle East Tensions Don't Automatically Mean $100 Oil—Here's Why
Everytime geopolitical tensions spike in the Middle East, your feed gets flooded with the same take: oil's heading to $100 a barrel. Guaranteed.
Except it rarely works that way.
Yes, Iran headlines grab attention. Yes, they move markets. But the leap from "conflict" to "oil supercycle" is where most predictions fall apart. A lot of people pushing these narratives? They already know the connection is thinner than they claim. They're not analyzing—they're fishing for engagement, turning uncertainty into clickbait.
The reality is messier. Oil prices respond to a cocktail of factors: supply disruptions, demand destruction, inventory levels, dollar strength, and market positioning. Strikes on Iranian infrastructure might disrupt supply *temporarily*, but they don't automatically lock in triple-digit oil. Prices spike, volatility amplifies, then reality settles in.
The playbook repeats because it works. Apocalyptic predictions spread faster than nuanced analysis ever will. But if you're serious about trading or macro positioning, you need to look past the noise and ask harder questions about actual supply constraints, spare capacity, and what demand actually does when prices spike.
That's where the real story lives—not in the reflexive $100 oil predictions.