Some content platforms' creator revenue sharing indeed needs to be re-evaluated. Seeing cases where someone posts 118 million views but only earns $5,000 is truly shocking. A comparison makes the problem even more apparent—YouTube creators can earn $10,000 for a video with 10 million views, while content creators on some subscription platforms can easily earn six figures per month with even less investment. This gap is hard not to criticize. If these platforms want to attract and retain high-quality creators, their revenue models may really need significant adjustments. The creator economy has become an important part of the Web3 ecosystem, but the unfairness of the distribution mechanism remains a long-term pain point.

View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
GasOptimizervip
· 3h ago
118 million views but only 5k? That ratio is heartbreaking, no wonder everyone left.
View OriginalReply0
RektRecordervip
· 3h ago
118 million views only for five thousand dollars? Damn, this is a robbery. With the same traffic, YouTube would have already paid ten times more.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidationTherapistvip
· 3h ago
118 million plays, $5,000? Wake up, buddy, this platform is just bloodsucking.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyIssuesvip
· 3h ago
118 million views and only getting 5,000? That's so outrageous. YouTube has long since phased out this kind of approach.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)