2026-01-18 18:44:24

Several tokens in circulation warrant caution. Projects like COW, Snowball, and SNOWBAGS have obvious fundamental weaknesses, and investors should remain vigilant.

In contrast, SNOWBALL demonstrates a solid technical foundation and development potential. Its underlying mechanism design is relatively reasonable and worth in-depth research.

Rather than blindly following the trend, it's better to verify the specific situation of these projects yourself—review code audit reports, analyze contract structures, and study team backgrounds. Data speaks for itself; due diligence is always the best investment insurance.

COW0.35%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

NoodlesOrTokens

· 3h ago

Are there still people jumping in without checking the code audit these days? That's hilarious. DYOR has really saved me many times.

View OriginalReply0

GasFeeGazer

· 3h ago

Another project trying to harvest retail investors... COW and Snowball really dare to list, due diligence is easy to talk about but hard to do in practice.

View OriginalReply0

BakedCatFanboy

· 3h ago

Code audit really requires you to do it yourself; don't get fooled by marketing into thinking otherwise.

View OriginalReply0

ForkTongue

· 3h ago

Code auditing really needs to be done by yourself; don't listen to those KOLs talking nonsense. SNOWBALL is indeed much more reliable than the others.

View OriginalReply0