Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Privacy has always been the most important underlying narrative in the crypto world. From Bitcoin's early pseudonymous design to various privacy coins optimized specifically for anonymity, this track has always been about storytelling. But by 2026, the days of privacy coins are becoming increasingly difficult.
Monero has been repeatedly delisted from major mainstream exchanges, Zcash is still alive but with little growth momentum, and new technological solutions like Aztec seem impressive but lack real application scenarios. In an environment where regulation is tightening and compliance has become a hard requirement, what kind of privacy solutions can survive and thrive?
Looking at the current main privacy coin projects makes it clear—they are on two completely different paths. Monero is an extremist, enforcing full-chain privacy, using cutting-edge technologies like ring signatures, stealth addresses, and RingCT to hide all transactions thoroughly. This approach offers unbeatable anonymity, but also comes with significant issues—large transaction sizes, high fees, and difficulty cooperating with regulators. The direct consequence is that in 2024, a major exchange delisted XMR, and other big players followed suit. Now, to buy Monero, you can only go to small exchanges or decentralized markets, and liquidity is no longer what it used to be.
Zcash has chosen a seemingly more balanced approach, defaulting to transparent transactions but offering users the option to shield transactions in a shielded pool. This sounds good—privacy options while maintaining communication with regulators. But in reality, most users are too lazy to bother, and they just use transparent transactions. The actual usage rate of shielded pools remains lukewarm.