veLISTA mechanism looks complicated, but when broken down, it’s just a few mathematical logics. Mastering these can help you make smarter locking decisions.



**Question 1: How long should I lock to maximize voting power?**

The formula is quite straightforward—your veLISTA = amount of LISTA locked × (lock duration / maximum lock period).

The specific numbers become clearer. For example, locking 100 LISTA for the maximum 52 weeks results in 100 × (52/52) = 100 veLISTA. But what if you lock for only 26 weeks? That’s 100 × (26/52) = 50 veLISTA. Want the same weight with a shorter lock? You need to put in more tokens. In simple terms, time is your capital efficiency.

**Question 2: Can the returns really be stable?**

Your weekly earnings ≈ (your veLISTA / total veLISTA in the network) × current distributable reward pool. It sounds reasonable, but there’s a catch—the total veLISTA in the network is floating. If a large holder suddenly locks a big amount long-term, the total surges, and your share gets diluted. Unless you also increase your lock amount, your proportion of earnings will be diluted. That’s the game. Long-term locking sacrifices liquidity but can lock in a relatively higher reward weight early on. When new users flood in later, it can also help resist some dilution.

**Question 3: Will voting power last forever?**

No. veLISTA is like an hourglass—once the lock end date approaches, your voting weight linearly decreases. For example, if you lock 100 veLISTA for 52 weeks, by week 26, your voting power is only half of the initial 50 veLISTA. The system uses this decay mechanism to encourage renewal or to make users accept the reality of decreasing influence.

**Practical tip: Don’t lock all at once**

Instead of locking all your tokens at once, try a step-by-step strategy—lock in batches with different durations. This way, you can retain some liquidity while balancing the curve of reward and weight changes. The decay of weight is no longer a cliff drop but a relatively smooth slope, allowing you to better adapt to market changes.
LISTA-9.93%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
DancingCandlesvip
· 4h ago
Oh wow, the tiered locking strategy is really clever, saving you from the panic of renewal after the voting rights collapse later on.
View OriginalReply0
DataBartendervip
· 4h ago
I just bought it and locked it in for 52 weeks straight. What's the point of splitting it up? I just like that all-or-nothing feeling.
View OriginalReply0
ZkSnarkervip
· 4h ago
ngl the ladder lock strategy hits different... actually tried the all-in approach once, regretted it immediately lmao
Reply0
AmateurDAOWatchervip
· 4h ago
Damn, this game theory is actually pretty solid. When big players come in, I get diluted. Damn it.
View OriginalReply0
FortuneTeller42vip
· 4h ago
Hmm... Tiered locking sounds good, but in actual operation, big players still tend to go all-in at once, and the weight gets locked in permanently.
View OriginalReply0
SleepyValidatorvip
· 4h ago
It's the same old trick again—more locking, more being cut. When big players come in, their profits are directly diluted to nothing.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)