The RWA chain reform track is experiencing a subtle dilemma. Many projects, in order to meet regulatory compliance standards, are forced to make compromises in product design—cumbersome review processes, complex verification steps—ultimately putting pressure on institutional operational teams. Efficiency has become the bottleneck.



However, some projects are redefining this issue with a different approach. A leading RWA solution that started with Layer1 and has been deeply involved for years has refused to accept the dichotomy of "compliance versus user experience" since 2018. Their core idea is: compliance verification doesn't have to be a front-end burden; it can be fully embedded into the backend architecture.

How is this achieved? Technologically, they use the PLONK zero-knowledge proof algorithm to handle privacy encryption and compliance traceability—key is embedding these logics into the system's underlying layer, making the process seamless for staff. Modular architecture ensures seamless integration with existing institutional systems, eliminating the need to switch interfaces or relearn processes, allowing on-chain capabilities to be integrated into daily workflows. At the same time, it can precisely align with mainstream regulatory frameworks like MiCA.

This solution has been validated on a securities trading project worth over 200 million euros. The opposing team was already accustomed to traditional operational rhythms, and the project did not require them to change any habits. Instead, through technical optimizations, on-chain compliance verification runs silently in the background. The pace of trading, reconciliation, and reporting remains unchanged, and the processing efficiency has increased by 30%.

Behind this lies a thought-provoking logic: compliance should not be a shackle on institutions but rather their confidence. Many RWA projects make a common mistake—treating compliance as an additional requirement, while neglecting that user experience is the true factor that determines success or failure. With a well-designed technical solution, both can coexist harmoniously. This balancing ability not only earns institutional trust but also lays a solid foundation for the large-scale promotion of RWA.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 7
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RamenStackervip
· 4h ago
The backend silent verification trick is ruthless, directly countering the false dilemma of choosing one out of two.
View OriginalReply0
RunWhenCutvip
· 4h ago
Oh wow, this is truly understanding RWA, not just purely stacking technical jargon.
View OriginalReply0
SerRugResistantvip
· 4h ago
Speaking of which, this is the right way. Putting compliance in the background is really clever.
View OriginalReply0
SelfCustodyBrovip
· 4h ago
Damn, this is the true Web3 mindset—compliance should be handled in the backend. --- Another boastful article. Can a project really reach 200 million euros? --- Zero-knowledge proofs feel overhyped, but this approach is indeed refreshing. --- The key is whether the code can hold up; anyone can perform meaningless operations by just talking. --- Finally, someone has thought through compliance clearly, it's not a black-and-white issue. --- I haven't heard much about the details of the PLONK update algorithm; want to learn more. --- A 30% efficiency increase? I don't believe it unless the data is presented. --- This is true technological empowerment—crushing projects that force Web2 logic onto the blockchain.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 4h ago
This is the right way. Running silently in the background is a brilliant move. Must compliance and user experience be at odds? It shows that the technology is not yet in place. That 200 million euros deal is serious; a 30% efficiency boost is no joke.
View OriginalReply0
ClassicDumpstervip
· 4h ago
Wow, stuffing compliance into the backend with this approach is really clever. But honestly, is there really no problem with the 200 million euro project actually getting off the ground?
View OriginalReply0
GweiWatchervip
· 4h ago
Wow, finally someone has explained this clearly. Compliance and user experience are not inherently opposed; the technical solution just sucks. The true experts make compliance run silently in the background, so users don't notice anything — that's top-tier design. The 200 million euro project directly improves efficiency by 30%, and this data says it all. Most RWA projects treat compliance as a gallows, no wonder no one uses them.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)