This is not only the first $rlm token project, but more importantly, it showcases the strength of the developers behind it. The original developer's technical skills are quite solid; he was the first to set up the RLM GitHub repository, and subsequent derivative projects were built based on it.



Here's an interesting phenomenon: some people bid higher for derivative versions, which is as unreasonable as spending more money to buy a counterfeit instead of the authentic product. The market can sometimes be irrational, but from the perspective of the project's true value and technical foundation, the importance of the original project is self-evident. For those who want to gain a deeper understanding of a project, figuring out who the true founder is and where the source of the technology lies is the foundation for making wise decisions.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
RugPullSurvivorvip
· 3h ago
Bro, there's nothing wrong with what you said, but I have to say, the market is so magical. The true source is actually ignored, everyone is just chasing the hot trends to make quick money. --- Counterfeit products sell for more than genuine ones, which is very normal in the crypto world. As long as the packaging is good and the story is told smoothly, the leeks will keep rushing forward. --- I've looked at that batch on GitHub, and indeed, the original developers' code is the most solid. But do you expect retail investors to dig through repositories? Dream on. --- Sometimes I think, this really is a common operation in the crypto circle. Whoever can tell the story convincingly wins; technical details are just an extra. --- People in the know all understand who the real boss is, but the problem is there are too few knowledgeable people. That's probably why derivative projects are priced even higher. --- That's right, but the reality is most people can't tell who is who at all. The true founders are actually drowned out, which is a bit ironic. --- Understanding the source is important, but I dare to bet that 90% of people below this post won't really verify.
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityNinjavip
· 4h ago
Counterfeit products are actually selling for more, which is outrageous. The market is truly surreal.
View OriginalReply0
LongTermDreamervip
· 4h ago
Haha, this is a typical phenomenon in the crypto world. There are really many people who spend a lot of money to buy knockoffs, but I just can't understand it. Original developers have such solid technical skills, yet they still get outperformed? I've been tracking these projects for three years and have really discovered a pattern — the source is always the most valuable. The premium on counterfeit goods is something everyone would complain about, but when you think about it carefully, aren't we all doing this kind of foolish thing? Figuring out who is the parent and who is the child is really the key, otherwise it's just pure luck.
View OriginalReply0
CommunityLurkervip
· 4h ago
Tracing the source is the real key; many people are still throwing money into copycat projects, which is really funny.
View OriginalReply0
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
English
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)