2026-01-19 10:01:32

#美国核心物价涨幅不及市场预估 Recent trades have not performed well, causing some unrealized losses for everyone. During a detailed review, I kept pondering a question — how can crypto asset trading last longer?

After thinking it through, there are mainly two approaches in the market: one is called the "Systematic School." Strictly follow your trading system, open positions at key points with a predetermined risk-reward ratio (such as 1:2, 1:1.5), and then refrain from touching them. As long as the win rate remains stable, you can survive here. The other is called the "Averaging School." The focus is on position management — trade with small positions, avoid setting stop-losses, and continuously add to positions to lower the average cost, ultimately achieving profitability.

Both sound reliable, but honestly, there's a big gap between knowing and doing. If you had to choose, which strategy do you think is more resilient in this long-term capital game?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

Ramen_Until_Rich

· 9h ago

System faction, the flat distribution faction is just self-deception; lowering costs doesn't change the mindset, it's still collapsing.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoPunster

· 9h ago

The flatting strategy sounds like doing homework, while the gambling strategy sounds like risking your life. I choose the three strategies — full loss strategy, which has already survived two bear markets. Not setting a stop loss is like betting that the heavens won't abandon you. I advise you not to do that. Strategy 1: A 2:1 return sounds incredibly tempting, but in reality, the 2:1 cut of your gains feels even better. There's more than just a chasm between knowing and doing; in between, there's my greed and fear. Honestly, whether you live long or not mainly depends on whether you're willing to admit defeat — it's more effective than technical skills or anything else. The flatting strategy is just arguing with probability; in the end, you're never losing to the system, but to your mindset.

View OriginalReply0

BlockDetective

· 9h ago

The flatting strategy sounds great, but one pullback and you're liquidated. System-based strategies are probably the way to survive longer.

View OriginalReply0

GateUser-ccc36bc5

· 9h ago

The flat-lying faction feels good to listen to, but if you really hold on until death, it's easy to get liquidated. The system faction is boring but lasts longer, that's the difference, right?

View OriginalReply0

GigaBrainAnon

· 9h ago

The flat-lying faction sounds great, but in reality, it's just gambling on luck. One black swan event and it's all gone. The system faction is the one that lasts longer. Discipline is easy to say but hard to do.

View OriginalReply0