2026-01-20 20:21:39

【Deep Thinking: The Deadly Flaw of AI Agents】

Recently, I interacted with several on-chain AI dialogue systems and discovered a common phenomenon — they all suffer from severe "memory loss."

You clearly updated your holdings preferences five minutes ago, but the next moment, they treat you as a stranger. Opening a new chat window causes all previous context to instantly disappear. This is a true reflection of most current AI Agents: completely stateless(Stateless).

They have computational power but lack memory capability. To put it more vividly, each time a conversation is closed, they undergo a complete "brain capacity reset."

**This precisely exposes the biggest misalignment in the current Web3 community.**

Everyone is frantically competing — model parameters, computing power, hype around Agent concepts. But if you dig through various whitepapers, you'll find that only a few projects see through the core issue: if AI can't even remember user identities, then the so-called "intelligent agent" is at best a sophisticated chatbot.

Vanar Chain has proposed a different approach at this critical juncture. It no longer insists on the label of a gaming public chain but instead shifts focus to a higher-level infrastructure — creating an AI "memory layer."

This is an interesting narrative shift. From merely competing in L1 performance to becoming the cognitive foundation of the AI era. The underlying logic is quite straightforward:

**Without persistent identity recognition and state recording, AI Agents can only ever be tools.**

What Vanar aims to do is to turn "remembering" into a public chain-level infrastructure. This way, any AI application built on it will inherently possess deep user cognition — persistent interaction memory, accumulated behavioral data, and trustworthy identity information.

What seems like a technical detail adjustment is actually a redefinition of the value positioning of public chains in the AI era. From supporting gaming assets to hosting AI intelligence itself.

Whether this shift can succeed depends on whether it can truly solve the memory dilemma of on-chain AI applications. If successful, Vanar could evolve from being misunderstood as a "gaming public chain" into a key player in the AI infrastructure track.

VANRY-1.6%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

6 Likes

Reward
6
3
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

PessimisticLayer

· 6h ago

Indeed, these AI Agents now suffer from amnesia; they forget everything after a refresh. Basically, they're just advanced chatbots pretending to be intelligent agents, just talking about performance metrics. The idea of a memory layer is quite innovative; whether it can be implemented successfully is the key. However, Vanar's shift is quite interesting... moving from a gaming public chain to infrastructure, taking a big gamble.

View OriginalReply0

CryptoCross-TalkClub

· 6h ago

Laughing to death, AI can't even remember my holdings, and you still want to make it my intelligent agent? Isn't that insulting to intelligence? Artificial intelligence turning into artificial amnesia, I would call this move in the Web3 circle the strongest brain reset device. It seems I have to rely on Vanar to install a hard drive in these AIs, or they'll keep introducing themselves to me every day, and even social anxiety might kick in. Reading the white paper is like watching a comedy script—imagination runs wild, but reality is a mess. Everyone, if Vanar can really make AI remember us this time, our leek farming career might be rewritten. Another public chain savior has arrived; the bear market has taught me to stay optimistic.

View OriginalReply0

BanklessAtHeart

· 6h ago

Ha, isn't this the true portrayal of AI Agents right now? Every time, they act like amnesiacs, really unbearable. That's right, everyone is hyping parameters, but they don't realize they can't solve the fundamental issues at all, still competing to be worse. The idea of a memory layer is quite fresh, but whether it can truly be implemented depends on the code—white papers are easy to write. Switching from gaming chains to AI infrastructure? Interesting, but with so many competitors, can Vanar really stand out? It still seems to depend on execution. Persistent identity recognition is indeed a pain point. If it can be successfully developed, there might be a chance, but it's too early to tell now.

View OriginalReply0