Gate Square “Creator Certification Incentive Program” — Recruiting Outstanding Creators!
Join now, share quality content, and compete for over $10,000 in monthly rewards.
How to Apply:
1️⃣ Open the App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your [avatar] in the top right.
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified], submit your application, and wait for approval.
Apply Now: https://www.gate.com/questionnaire/7159
Token rewards, exclusive Gate merch, and traffic exposure await you!
Details: https://www.gate.com/announcements/article/47889
Recently, Bitcoin dropped to $88,000, and Ethereum couldn't hold its ground, falling close to $2,900. Amid market fluctuations, a more noteworthy signal is quietly changing in the shadows.
A set of data reveals the story. As of January 21, BitMine held 4.203 million ETH, accounting for 3.48% of the total Ethereum supply. During the same period, MicroStrategy held 709,700 BTC, representing 3.38% of the total Bitcoin supply.
At first glance, these two figures seem similar, but a closer look reveals a problem—the control over Ethereum by a single institution has quietly surpassed its control over Bitcoin. This is no small matter.
Why is that? Because concentration of holdings directly determines market pricing power. When an institution controls more than 3.4% of an asset's circulating supply, their buying and selling can significantly influence market expectations. The situation with Ethereum is even more sensitive—the pace of institutional accumulation is accelerating, and market pricing power is quietly shifting.
Here, an interesting contradiction emerges: Ethereum has always touted itself as "decentralized," but from the holding structure, asset concentration is actually increasing. The narrative and reality are starting to diverge. Could this dissonance affect future market performance? This question might be more worth pondering than the price itself.