2026-01-21 01:21:21

The recent market atmosphere has indeed been somewhat oppressive. Bitcoin has fallen below the $88,000 mark, while the Trump administration has wielded tariffs against the EU for geopolitical ambitions, causing investor anxiety.

Some may ask, didn't we also play the tariff card last year? Why is the reaction so different this time?

The key difference lies in the nature of the change. Last year's tariff policies were essentially commercial bargaining chips, and parties could still negotiate within the framework of globalization. But this year is completely different — it’s about tearing up agreements and extorting allies for territorial expansion. Words are not being kept, and trust is breaking down.

When one side sacrifices its allies' economic stability for geopolitical gains, the "wall of distrust" between them is truly erected. Since trust has collapsed, why should capital obediently stay in traditional financial infrastructure that could be frozen or scrutinized at any moment? This is the true picture of the so-called "digital decoupling."

In the era of "building walls," the situation has changed. If your assets are still on fully transparent, easily regulated chains, that is the real risk. Amid the rise of regionalism, capital now seeks not just borderless movement but "privacy with sovereign protection."

Every cross-border capital flow may face unprecedented scrutiny. This is why technologies like privacy computing and on-chain identity sovereignty are beginning to meet genuine market demand — not out of idealism, but out of necessity. In an era of geopolitical fragmentation, how to maintain capital liquidity while avoiding becoming a pawn in any side’s game has become a new core issue.

BTC-3.12%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

ProxyCollector

· 2h ago

Trust shatters, and the chain becomes valuable --- Honestly, who still dares to put money in traditional finance? Frozen at any time --- This time is really different. Last year, we could still negotiate, but this year, the agreement is directly torn apart --- Geopolitical collapse, privacy chains are about to take off --- Capital fleeing transparent chains, this is the true story of digital decoupling --- Sovereign privacy > borderless, the era has changed --- Every cross-border transaction is under scrutiny for risk, no wonder everyone is fleeing --- In the era of building walls, your assets on the chain are actually more dangerous --- Trust breakdown is the best advertisement for these privacy technologies --- Tariffs come crashing down, and the chain has become a safe haven --- Capital is not looking for borderless, but a protective shell

View OriginalReply0

BearMarketSage

· 2h ago

Trust has collapsed and self-rescue is necessary; this analysis hits the point. --- Breaking 88,000 isn't that important; the key is that people's confidence has dispersed. --- But to be honest, can privacy coins really beat regulation? I'm a bit skeptical. --- Playing geopolitical cards, the retail investors are footing the bill—same old story. --- So, decentralization and self-custody are the way to go; don't rely on any infrastructure. --- Is this logic self-consistent? Wanting both liquidity and privacy—fish and bear's paw. --- Capital's real fear isn't transparency but freezing; that's not wrong. --- Feels like we're back in the dark web era? Blockchain still has that vibe at the end of the day. --- Privacy protected by sovereignty? Sounds pretty contradictory, haha. --- Instead of researching on-chain identities, it's better to first solve cross-chain liquidity issues.

View OriginalReply0

Degentleman

· 3h ago

Trust is something that, once broken, is very hard to mend. Now it seems the logic of the crypto world has finally been validated by traditional finance. Basically, we are entering an era of individual governance, and privacy has truly become a necessity. We can't hold the 88,000 level, but the future asset forms needed are already very clear. As regulations tighten more and more, decentralization has become the last line of defense. This time is different; last year, we could still negotiate terms, but now they are directly turning hostile and extorting. Yes, the term "digital decoupling" is quite fitting. The demand for sovereign privacy is real; it's not just empty talk.

View OriginalReply0

AltcoinTherapist

· 3h ago

The key is that trust is gone; everything else is useless. --- Exactly, this time really feels different, like they're about to change the rules. --- Wait, is this the wave where privacy coins are about to rise? --- The 88,000 drop was so fast; we need to see if the support can hold in the coming days. --- Instead of hiding on the chain, it's better to diversify across multiple chains. --- Geopolitical fragmentation, huh? Then I need to replan my assets. --- Privacy that protects sovereignty sounds ideal, but can it really be achieved? --- A couple of years ago, we were shouting about borderless finance; now we have to consider the risk of freezing—ironic. --- Balancing capital liquidity and privacy—this is indeed a new challenge. --- Trump's recent move immediately made me switch back to spot trading.

View OriginalReply0