2026-01-23 09:30:45

In a major escalation of tensions between political leadership and traditional banking institutions, Trump has filed a substantial lawsuit against JPMorgan Chase and its CEO Jamie Dimon, seeking $5 billion in damages. The legal action centers on allegations that the bank engaged in selective account closures based on political considerations—a charge that carries significant implications for the broader financial ecosystem.

This development comes amid growing scrutiny of how major financial institutions handle relationships with politically controversial figures and entities. The case raises critical questions about banking neutrality and the criteria used for account termination decisions.

The lawsuit underscores the tension between Wall Street and political establishments, particularly regarding how traditional finance institutions navigate politically sensitive relationships. For the crypto and fintech communities, this case represents a broader conversation about financial access and institutional gatekeeping practices.

Industry observers see this dispute as emblematic of deeper concerns about centralized financial control and selective service provision—themes that have long resonated within decentralized finance movements.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

13 Likes

Reward
13
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-a180694b

· 5h ago

Selective account closure by banks? Ha, this is the true face of traditional finance. They deserve to be replaced by DeFi.

View OriginalReply0

BlockchainBrokenPromise

· 5h ago

Banks' selective account closures have long become tiresome; this CeFi trick is just proving why we need DeFi.

View OriginalReply0

MEVHunter_9000

· 5h ago

Haha, the story of banks selectively closing accounts has finally been exposed... Now the big banks also have to taste the feeling of being frozen. --- JPMorgan's recent actions are really unsustainable, luckily we have crypto as a backup. --- Basically, it's the old trick of centralized finance. Now it's their turn to suffer losses, and it's satisfying. --- Fifty billion... If we can really win this, it would be a huge positive signal for DeFi. --- The era of banks monopolizing financial access should be over. This case is a breakthrough. --- The reason no one dared to make a move before is unclear; now they are finally serious. --- That's why we need decentralization... Centralized institutions can shut down your account at will, with no room for negotiation.

View OriginalReply0

HashRateHermit

· 6h ago

Haha, finally seeing traditional finance internal conflicts. Isn't this exactly the centralized risk we've been talking about all along? JPM's recent moves are truly disappointing; selective account bans and still trying to hide it? Web3 has long been doing the opposite of this. Trump winning the lawsuit benefits the crypto community because it gives us the best public opinion ammunition. A lawsuit fee of 500 million... no matter how you calculate it, it's a joke. The key is that the game of financial scrutiny has finally been exposed. Banks talk about security and risk control, but deep down it's a game of power and money. Truly laughable.

View OriginalReply0

rekt_but_not_broke

· 6h ago

Haha, now it's all good. Traditional finance has started biting each other, no need for us to say anything.

View OriginalReply0