You guys argue every day about who has higher TPS and lower fees, but my mind keeps stuck on the question of "who do we really trust for this cross-chain transfer"... To be honest, crossing a chain isn't as simple as clicking a button. I quite like the idea of IBC: Chain A first locks or proves a certain state, and Chain B verifies it through a light client, which involves consensus and validator sets, at least the structure is clear. But once it turns into various "message passing + bridges," the trust scope starts to widen: whether the relays are running correctly, if the light client implementation has issues, who holds the upgrade permissions, whether price feeds/multisigs can be bypassed, and whether monitoring and alerts can detect anomalies immediately. Anyway, when I look at cross-chain now, I first draw a component diagram and then decide whether to get involved, because otherwise, if something really goes wrong, I won't know who to blame.