Lately I've been thinking about on-chain privacy. To be honest, ordinary users shouldn't expect to be "completely invisible"... On the blockchain, it's just a ledger; what can be hidden more is just distancing your actions and identity, not making them disappear. The compliance line is also quite realistic—when platforms/wallets need you to prove who you are, you still have to cooperate, or you'll get stuck at the entry and exit points.



Seeing everyone guessing whether projects will migrate before and after the main public chain upgrades, I'm actually more concerned about: it doesn't really matter where they migrate to, data just moves along. Don't think switching chains means switching worlds. Anyway, my current approach is more like "backing up" myself: keeping multiple routes, using several addresses separately, not putting important information in the same basket... Not seeking mystery, just hoping not to be easily linked at a glance. Only those who have stepped into the pit understand—when it comes to privacy, lowering expectations can make things much better.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • Comment
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
Add a comment
Add a comment
No comments
  • Pinned