Dear developers, I have to vent. Recently, we deployed our DApp across several chains—Ethereum, Solana, Base, Aptos—and almost tore the team apart—everything was stuck on the oracle issue. Everything went smoothly on Ethereum, calling Chainlink for price feeds, a few lines of code to handle it. But once we moved to Solana, the documentation changed completely, and we had to research Pyth integration. When it came to Base, it was another set of deployment logic for Chainlink on L2. Different chains, oracles are like power outlets in different countries—interfaces, fees, update frequencies are all different. We kept messing around, wasting a month, just acting as "oracle adapters" all day. Seeing the workload of 40 chains piling up in front of me, I was almost hopeless. Later, I tried the APRO multi-chain oracle solution. To be honest, I was quite skeptical at first—everyone's tired of hearing "support all chains." But after using it, it really felt different—it effectively solved some of the most critical pain points. For example, deployment efficiency. Previously, each chain required manual configuration of consumer contracts, setting data sources, testing price feed delays—doing this for 40 chains could take until the end of the year. Now, with a few clicks in the backend to select the data types needed, and deploying to multiple chains with one click, it saved a developer’s workload. For our small team, the effect is quite noticeable.

In this round of the market, Ethereum has been consistently catching up on the rebound. I've mentioned this several times before, and the current rebound compared to Bitcoin is indeed more aggressive—there's no way around it, given the size of the market. From a technical perspective, holding above the 3000 level is considered stable. However, the smaller time frame shows some weakness, and a correction or pullback is inevitable. In the short term, around 3050 is a relatively good level to watch, and you can consider entry points based on trading volume and support conditions.

In the contract battlefield of high-volatility assets like ETH and SOL, the most realistic truth is—surviving is more important than making big money. Have you experienced these situations too? Watching others’ K-line charts skyrocket, while you’re catching the top. The very next second after you sell, the main force reverses and hits again. Staying up every night watching the fluctuations until dawn, only to find your account getting smaller and smaller. This is not bad luck, nor is it a lack of effort. Essentially, most people simply don’t understand how the main players are harvesting, let alone master their own defensive rhythm. I’ve also walked this bloody path—being爆, being cut, and repeatedly being taught lessons. Only later did I realize a core logic: contract trading is not a get-rich-quick tool; its essence is a survival game. Those who can make money in the market long-term are betting on these bottom lines: Only entering at high-probability entry points, avoiding chasing highs or bottom-fishing blindly. Using low leverage to verify trends, rather than high leverage to gamble on a single move. Always setting stop-losses before opening a position, not after. Strictly controlling position size, immediately moving the stop-loss to the breakeven point when there’s floating profit—making the principal an insurance. It sounds dull, but once your principal is safe, the market becomes your ATM. As long as you are in the game, making money is just a matter of time. But once you get wiped out, your skills, mindset, and opportunities are all reset to zero. If you also want to change this situation—no longer being harvested for liquidity by the main players, no longer being manipulated by emotional swings of K-line charts every day, and truly learning the survival tactics in contracts—then it’s time to change your strategy. Starting from the rhythm of first surviving, then gradually making money, is the winning game rule.