📣 Creators, Exciting News!
Gate Square Certified Creator Application Is Now Live!
How to apply:
1️⃣ Open App → Tap [Square] at the bottom → Click your avatar in the top right
2️⃣ Tap [Get Certified] under your avatar
3️⃣ Once approved, you’ll get an exclusive verified badge that highlights your credibility and expertise!
Note: You need to update App to version 7.25.0 or above to apply.
The application channel is now open to KOLs, project teams, media, and business partners!
Super low threshold, just 500 followers + active posting to apply!
At Gate Square, everyone can be a community leader! �
$19B Crypto Liquidations: Why It Didn't Mean $19B in Losses
The cryptocurrency market’s largest liquidation event ever—over $19 billion—didn’t equate to equivalent losses, as analysts emphasize the distinction between notional value and actual capital wiped out.
The Crash Mechanics: Notional vs. Real Losses
Liquidations occur when leveraged positions breach margin thresholds, forcing closures. The $19 billion reflects notional exposure—the full position size—not the margin at risk. With average 10x leverage, a $2,000 position might risk only $200, so liquidations unwind synthetic debt rather than evaporate cash. Sam Seo of Kaia DLT Foundation explains: “The remaining 85-95% was simply phantom leverage, synthetic exposure that was rapidly unwound.” Patrick Heusser of Sentora adds: “When a long is liquidated, the trader typically loses their posted margin; the rest was borrowed exposure.”
The event, five times larger than prior records, involved $10 billion+ in derivatives, with Bitcoin dropping to $104,000 and altcoins 15-20%. Exchanges sum notional values for headlines, inflating perceptions, as Ray Youssef of NoOnes notes: “Each position is summed up by notional value, which drastically inflates the headline number.”
Expert Insights: Healthy Deleveraging or Systemic Risk?
Udi Wertheimer, a Bitcoin developer, clarifies: “[$19B] in liquidations doesn’t mean people lost [$19B]. It means [$19B] worth of leveraged positions were forced-closed.” Matteo Greco of Fineqia views it as “a gauge of leveraged exposure forcibly closed,” signaling reduced confidence but not total evaporation. Seo warns of liquidity evaporation and market immaturity: “It reveals an ecosystem prioritizing speculative amplification over stable growth.” The crash’s infrastructure failures, like jammed trading paths, amplified chaos, with open interest collapsing $10 billion in derivatives.
2025 Takeaways: Lessons for DeFi Resilience
This deleveraging “cleanses” excess leverage, per Youssef, but exposes risks in infrastructure. In 2025’s $150 billion+ DeFi TVL era, it urges better risk models and audits. While losses were contained, the event dented confidence, though quick recovery above $116,000 suggests maturity.
In summary, the $19B liquidation was synthetic unwind, not $19B loss, highlighting DeFi’s volatility but resilience in 2025’s evolving market.