TREE vs FIL: Comparing Storage Solutions for Web3 Applications

This article provides a detailed comparison between Treehouse (TREE) and Filecoin (FIL), focusing on their investment value and storage solutions for Web3 applications. It analyzes historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and potential risks. The target audience includes new and experienced investors seeking insights into crypto storage solutions. Key sections include a price history comparison, factors affecting investment value, predictions for 2025-2030, investment strategies, and conclusion on the better buy for storage solutions. Explore details on Gate for real-time updates and strategic advice.

Introduction: Investment Comparison of TREE vs FIL

In the cryptocurrency market, the comparison between Treehouse (TREE) vs Filecoin (FIL) has been an unavoidable topic for investors. The two not only show significant differences in market cap ranking, application scenarios, and price performance but also represent different positioning in the crypto asset space.

Treehouse (TREE): Since its launch, it has gained market recognition for its focus on fixed income in crypto and decentralized benchmark rates.

Filecoin (FIL): Introduced in 2020, it has been hailed as a decentralized storage network, representing one of the largest cryptocurrencies by market cap and trading volume globally.

This article will provide a comprehensive analysis of the investment value comparison between TREE and FIL, focusing on historical price trends, supply mechanisms, institutional adoption, technological ecosystems, and future predictions, aiming to answer the question most crucial to investors:

"Which is the better buy right now?"

I. Price History Comparison and Current Market Status

  • 2025: TREE experienced significant volatility, with its price fluctuating between $0.0835 and $1.3524.
  • 2021: FIL reached its all-time high of $236.84 on April 1, 2021, driven by increased interest in decentralized storage solutions.
  • Comparative analysis: In the current market cycle, TREE has fallen from its high of $1.3524 to a low of $0.0835, while FIL has declined from its peak of $236.84 to current levels around $1.907.

Current Market Situation (2025-11-19)

  • TREE current price: $0.14114
  • FIL current price: $1.907
  • 24-hour trading volume: TREE $192,471.89884 vs FIL $6,683,305.72241
  • Market Sentiment Index (Fear & Greed Index): 15 (Extreme Fear)

Click to view real-time prices:

price_image1 price_image2

II. Core Factors Affecting TREE vs FIL Investment Value

Supply Mechanism Comparison (Tokenomics)

  • FIL: The value of Filecoin is fundamentally tied to real storage demand growth in the decentralized storage market
  • TREE Coin: Shows significant price volatility, with prices ranging from $0.31 to $0.60 within 24 hours in 2025 projections
  • 📌 Historical Pattern: Both tokens display speculative price movements, with FIL potentially capturing up to 20% of global cloud storage and CDN market value

Institutional Adoption and Market Applications

  • Institutional Holdings: Industry experts project FIL could reach values of up to 1000 yuan per coin with market capitalization exceeding 90 billion yuan
  • Enterprise Adoption: FIL's value depends on whether businesses and users increasingly choose Filecoin as their storage service provider
  • Regulatory Attitude: Both tokens face typical crypto market investment risks with uncertain regulatory environments

Technical Development and Ecosystem Building

  • FIL Technical Upgrades: Focused on becoming a competitive alternative to traditional cloud storage and content delivery networks
  • TREE Technical Development: Limited information on specific technical developments
  • Ecosystem Comparison: FIL has a clearer use case in decentralized storage, while TREE's ecosystem applications remain less defined in available data

Macroeconomic Factors and Market Cycles

  • Performance in Inflationary Environment: Insufficient data to determine inflation-resistant properties
  • Macroeconomic Monetary Policy: Both cryptocurrencies subject to typical market volatility and speculative forces
  • Geopolitical Factors: FIL's adoption depends on global market trends in cloud storage adoption

III. Price Prediction for 2025-2030: TREE vs FIL

Short-term Prediction (2025)

  • TREE: Conservative $0.118608 - $0.1412 | Optimistic $0.1412 - $0.173676
  • FIL: Conservative $1.36462 - $1.922 | Optimistic $1.922 - $2.4025

Mid-term Prediction (2027)

  • TREE may enter a growth phase, with estimated price range $0.1501013892 - $0.2126436347
  • FIL may enter a consolidation phase, with estimated price range $2.09522025 - $2.6907039
  • Key drivers: Institutional capital inflow, ETF, ecosystem development

Long-term Prediction (2030)

  • TREE: Base scenario $0.225916571618251 - $0.235329762102345 | Optimistic scenario $0.235329762102345 - $0.3412281550484
  • FIL: Base scenario $3.167851092722662 - $3.26582586878625 | Optimistic scenario $3.26582586878625 - $3.6577249730406

View detailed price predictions for TREE and FIL

Disclaimer: This analysis is based on historical data and market projections. Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile and unpredictable. This information should not be considered as financial advice. Always conduct your own research before making investment decisions.

TREE:

年份 预测最高价 预测平均价格 预测最低价 涨跌幅
2025 0.173676 0.1412 0.118608 0
2026 0.19994626 0.157438 0.13539668 11
2027 0.2126436347 0.17869213 0.1501013892 26
2028 0.2171913494085 0.19566788235 0.1467509117625 38
2029 0.26422990832544 0.20642961587925 0.144500731115475 46
2030 0.3412281550484 0.235329762102345 0.225916571618251 66

FIL:

年份 预测最高价 预测平均价格 预测最低价 涨跌幅
2025 2.4025 1.922 1.36462 0
2026 2.24874 2.16225 1.600065 13
2027 2.6907039 2.205495 2.09522025 15
2028 3.2070102795 2.44809945 2.007441549 28
2029 3.7040968728225 2.82755486475 1.92273730803 48
2030 3.6577249730406 3.26582586878625 3.167851092722662 71

IV. Investment Strategy Comparison: TREE vs FIL

Long-term vs Short-term Investment Strategies

  • TREE: Suitable for investors focused on fixed income in crypto and decentralized benchmark rates
  • FIL: Suitable for investors interested in decentralized storage solutions and cloud storage market potential

Risk Management and Asset Allocation

  • Conservative investors: TREE: 30% vs FIL: 70%
  • Aggressive investors: TREE: 50% vs FIL: 50%
  • Hedging tools: Stablecoin allocation, options, cross-currency portfolios

V. Potential Risk Comparison

Market Risk

  • TREE: High volatility, limited market data
  • FIL: Dependent on growth of decentralized storage market

Technical Risk

  • TREE: Scalability, network stability
  • FIL: Storage provider concentration, security vulnerabilities

Regulatory Risk

  • Global regulatory policies may affect both tokens differently, with uncertain regulatory environments for cryptocurrencies in general

VI. Conclusion: Which Is the Better Buy?

📌 Investment Value Summary:

  • TREE advantages: Focus on fixed income in crypto, potential for growth in decentralized finance
  • FIL advantages: Established position in decentralized storage, potential for significant market share in cloud storage

✅ Investment Advice:

  • New investors: Consider a small allocation to FIL as part of a diversified crypto portfolio
  • Experienced investors: Balance between TREE and FIL based on risk tolerance and market outlook
  • Institutional investors: Evaluate FIL's potential in the enterprise storage market, monitor TREE's development in DeFi

⚠️ Risk Warning: Cryptocurrency markets are highly volatile. This analysis does not constitute investment advice. None

FAQ

Q1: What are the key differences between TREE and FIL? A: TREE focuses on fixed income in crypto and decentralized benchmark rates, while FIL is a decentralized storage network. FIL has a larger market cap and trading volume, and a clearer use case in decentralized storage. TREE's ecosystem applications are less defined based on available data.

Q2: How do the current prices and market situations of TREE and FIL compare? A: As of 2025-11-19, TREE's price is $0.14114 with a 24-hour trading volume of $192,471.89884. FIL's price is $1.907 with a 24-hour trading volume of $6,683,305.72241. The market sentiment index is at 15, indicating extreme fear.

Q3: What are the price predictions for TREE and FIL in 2030? A: For TREE, the base scenario predicts a range of $0.225916571618251 - $0.235329762102345, with an optimistic scenario of $0.235329762102345 - $0.3412281550484. For FIL, the base scenario predicts $3.167851092722662 - $3.26582586878625, with an optimistic scenario of $3.26582586878625 - $3.6577249730406.

Q4: How do the supply mechanisms of TREE and FIL differ? A: FIL's value is tied to real storage demand growth in the decentralized storage market. TREE shows significant price volatility, with prices ranging from $0.31 to $0.60 within 24 hours in 2025 projections. Both tokens display speculative price movements.

Q5: What are the main risks associated with investing in TREE and FIL? A: Both face market risks such as high volatility. TREE has limited market data, while FIL is dependent on the growth of the decentralized storage market. Technical risks include scalability and network stability for TREE, and storage provider concentration for FIL. Both are subject to uncertain regulatory environments.

Q6: How might institutional adoption affect the value of TREE and FIL? A: Industry experts project FIL could reach values of up to 1000 yuan per coin with market capitalization exceeding 90 billion yuan. FIL's value depends on whether businesses increasingly choose Filecoin as their storage provider. There's limited information on TREE's institutional adoption.

Q7: What investment strategies are recommended for TREE and FIL? A: For conservative investors, a 30% TREE to 70% FIL allocation is suggested. Aggressive investors might consider a 50-50 split. New investors may want to start with a small allocation to FIL as part of a diversified crypto portfolio. Experienced investors should balance between TREE and FIL based on risk tolerance and market outlook.

* The information is not intended to be and does not constitute financial advice or any other recommendation of any sort offered or endorsed by Gate.