
A nominator is someone who delegates their tokens as “votes” to trusted validators, empowering them to produce blocks and help secure the network. This allows nominators to participate in network security and rewards distribution without the need to run servers or maintain nodes themselves.
In Proof of Stake (PoS) networks, the system determines block production rights based on the amount of tokens staked. Validators operate the nodes, pack transactions, and create new blocks. Nominators stake tokens and select validators, allocating their voting power to these nodes—creating a security model where “capital votes” for trustworthy network operators.
Nominators lock their tokens on-chain through staking and nominate one or more validators they trust. If their chosen validator is selected by the network to produce a block, any rewards generated are distributed between the validator and their nominators according to protocol rules.
Think of it as giving your ticket to a driver: the driver (validator) is responsible for the journey, while the passenger (nominator) earns a share of the returns based on their contribution, but also bears a portion of any penalties if the driver misbehaves. While each blockchain may have slight variations in distribution rules and nomination methods, the core logic is similar.
Nominators play a crucial role in determining which validators gain enough weight to join the active validator set, directly impacting the network’s security and level of decentralization. When staking power is more distributed, the risk of network control by a small group of nodes decreases.
Additionally, nominators direct support toward high-performing nodes, fostering a market-driven environment where the best validators thrive. Transparent commission structures, strong uptime, and proven performance records tend to attract more nominators, strengthening the overall ecosystem.
Nominator rewards typically come from protocol inflation and transaction fees. Validators first collect a service commission, with the remaining rewards divided among nominators based on their proportion of total stake.
For example, if a validator sets a 10% commission, this is deducted from the total rewards earned by the validator and their nominators; the remaining 90% is distributed according to each participant’s staked amount. The timing of reward distribution depends on chain design—settlement may occur per round or epoch, and whether rewards are automatically restaked depends on chain or platform settings.
Key factors for selecting validators are “stability, cost-effectiveness, and diligence.” First, assess stability: check validator uptime and historical block production. Next, evaluate cost: review commission rates for fairness. Third, consider diligence: look for validators that consistently maintain their nodes and engage with the community.
To minimize single-point risks, nominators often spread their stake across multiple validators. Avoid nominating “oversubscribed” or highly congested validators, as your weight may not be fully effective or could yield lower returns. On platforms such as Gate’s staking or yield products, the platform may select and manage validator portfolios for users—this simplifies onboarding for beginners but requires attention to product terms and fees.
Nominators face several key risks:
Always exercise caution with financial operations—diversifying nominations and choosing compliant platforms with transparent validators are essential first steps in risk management.
Different ecosystems use different terminology. In Polkadot/Kusama, “nominator” is common; in Cosmos, “delegator” is used more frequently. Both roles delegate staking power to validators, but differences exist in the number of allowed nominations, reward distribution methods, commission settings, and election algorithms.
Think of them as variations of the same role under different systems—nomination targets are similar, but voting methods and payout details differ. Always review chain-specific documentation and community guides before participating; don’t assume rules from one blockchain apply universally.
Step 1: Choose Your Network and Asset. Decide which PoS blockchain you want to participate in (e.g., Polkadot) and prepare the corresponding tokens plus a small amount for gas fees.
Step 2: Set Up Your Wallet. Install a wallet compatible with your chosen chain or use an exchange account; back up your seed phrase and enable security features.
Step 3: Review Lock-up and Minimums. Read about staking lock periods, minimum staking amounts, unbonding processes, and potential fees on your chosen chain.
Step 4: Select Validators. Assess node uptime, track record, commission rates, and community reputation; diversify nominations and keep notes on your choices.
Step 5: Submit Nomination Transaction. Use on-chain tools or platform interfaces to stake tokens and nominate validators; confirm amounts and targets; wait for blockchain confirmation.
Step 6: Monitor and Adjust Regularly. Check rewards, validator performance, and announcements periodically; if validator status or rates change, adjust nominations accordingly. On Gate’s staking products, reward cycles and fee structures are disclosed—refer to product pages for specifics.
Polkadot uses “Nominated Proof of Stake” (NPoS), allowing nominators to support multiple validators. The network selects active validators based on total staked weight and algorithmic criteria. Rewards are distributed based on validator activity and commission; slashing applies if validators misbehave. To lower entry barriers, Polkadot offers nomination pools so users with smaller stakes can participate collectively under pool-managed strategies.
As of October 2024, details on Polkadot’s NPoS and nomination pools can be found in the Polkadot Wiki and official documentation (Source: Polkadot Wiki, 2024). Always check current rules and parameters before participating—protocol upgrades may change nomination limits, commissions, or reward cycles.
Nominators use their tokens to “vote” for validators, allowing them to contribute to network security and earn rewards without running nodes themselves. Understanding PoS mechanics, validator roles, reward structures, commissions, slashing penalties, and lock-up periods is fundamental for safe participation. In practice, diversifying nominations and choosing stable, transparent validators with reasonable fees can improve your risk-reward balance; platform-based products offer an easier entry but come with additional fee and custody considerations. Stay updated with each chain’s latest rules (such as Polkadot’s NPoS and nomination pools), monitor regularly, and adjust strategies to maximize your “voting” power.
Nominated tokens are frozen during the lock-up period; you cannot transfer or trade them freely during this time. The lock period varies by network; on Polkadot it is typically 28 days. You will continue earning rewards during this period. After you un-nominate, you must wait until the lock period ends before your funds are fully released to your account.
There is risk involved. If your nominated validator is penalized (slashed) due to misconduct or downtime, a portion of your staked funds will also be deducted. This is why it is vital to select reputable validators with strong technical performance—regularly check your nominated validators’ status.
Minimum staking amounts are set by each network; on Polkadot you usually need at least a few DOT tokens. There is typically no hard maximum—the more you stake, the higher your chances of being selected as an active nominator. Start with what you can afford and consider increasing your stake gradually.
Yes. Nominators can usually support multiple validators simultaneously (Polkadot allows up to 16), which helps spread risk and stabilize returns. All nominations share the same staked funds pool—allocate accordingly.
Rewards are typically paid automatically per cycle into your staking account; on Polkadot each cycle is around 24 hours. You can check transaction history on blockchain explorers or view real-time earnings stats on staking pages of exchanges like Gate—this ensures rewards are credited properly.


