
Throughput refers to the number of transactions a blockchain can process within a given time frame, typically measured as TPS (transactions per second). In essence, throughput reflects how many transactions are finalized each second—similar to how many payments a cashier can process per second. Higher throughput enables the blockchain to serve more users simultaneously.
On-chain, transactions are bundled into “blocks.” A block is like a page in an accounting ledger, written at regular intervals—this interval is called the “block time.” The maximum number of transactions a block can contain is its “block capacity.” Throughput is determined by both block time and block capacity.
Throughput directly impacts user experience and the feasibility of decentralized applications. Higher throughput means transactions are more likely to be included in a block quickly, reducing waiting times and minimizing failure rates.
In DeFi trading, insufficient throughput can cause longer queues, delayed order execution, and increased slippage. During NFT minting or popular airdrops, low throughput often leads to “block congestion,” where a large number of transactions pile up in the queue. In blockchain games, limited throughput may result in interaction delays, negatively affecting playability.
For exchange users, network throughput affects the confirmation speed for deposits and withdrawals. When selecting a withdrawal network on Gate, choosing a network with low throughput and high congestion can lead to slower confirmations and may require higher gas fees to expedite processing.
A common method to estimate throughput (TPS) is:
Throughput (TPS) ≈ Number of transactions per block ÷ Block time (in seconds).
This provides a straightforward estimate:
Note that many blockchains use “block capacity” to limit the number of transactions per block. For instance, Ethereum controls block complexity using a “gas limit,” so block capacity isn’t fixed by transaction count but by computational complexity—therefore, TPS will vary depending on transaction types.
Throughput is primarily determined by block time and block capacity. Shorter block times and larger capacities theoretically increase TPS, but both involve trade-offs with technical complexity and security.
Gas fees and transaction queues also influence effective throughput. During network congestion, the mempool acts as a “waiting room”—transactions with higher gas fees are prioritized for inclusion in the next block, while those with lower fees may be delayed.
System design and parallel processing are critical as well. Blockchains supporting parallel execution can process multiple non-conflicting transactions simultaneously, increasing throughput. Sharding works like dividing a road into multiple lanes—each shard processes its own set of transactions in parallel.
Hardware and network infrastructure impose practical limits. As higher throughput demands stronger hardware and bandwidth from nodes, participation requirements rise, potentially impacting decentralization.
Throughput is commonly expressed as TPS; in most contexts, they are equivalent. However, “latency” refers to the time from submitting a transaction to its confirmation—like the wait from joining a queue until receiving your receipt.
A blockchain might have high throughput but still exhibit long latency if its block times are lengthy or confirmation requirements are strict. Conversely, low throughput combined with congestion significantly increases latency, even if block times remain constant.
There are four main approaches: reducing block time, increasing block capacity, enabling parallel execution, and utilizing layer 2 solutions. Each method has trade-offs.
Shortening block time allows more frequent ledger updates but imposes higher demands on network synchronization and security. Increasing block capacity accommodates more transactions per block but can raise the burden on node operators.
Parallel execution boosts efficiency by processing non-conflicting transactions at the same time. Sharding splits transaction processing across multiple parallel sub-chains, raising overall throughput.
Layer 2 solutions (such as Rollups) batch multiple transactions off-chain or on sidechains before submitting a proof to the mainnet—akin to “batch checkouts.” As of 2025, most major public chains are increasingly relying on layer 2 technologies to significantly raise overall throughput while preserving mainnet security.
Always assess risk when handling funds. Setting gas fees too low may result in long delays; excessive fees increase costs. For cross-chain or layer 2 withdrawals, always verify contract addresses and network selection to prevent misdirected assets.
Pursuing higher throughput may raise hardware requirements for nodes, reducing participation and potentially undermining decentralization. Lower decentralization weakens censorship resistance and system robustness.
Faster block production under abnormal conditions may increase chain reorganization risks, impacting short-term finality. Parallel execution requires precise conflict management—poor design may introduce new vulnerabilities.
At the user level, blindly raising gas fees during congestion can result in unnecessary costs; using unfamiliar layer 2 or cross-chain solutions without proper due diligence exposes users to smart contract or operational risks. When depositing or withdrawing on Gate, always double-check networks and addresses and follow official announcements for risk updates.
The current trend is “modular design and layer 2 scaling.” Mainnets increasingly focus on security and data availability while execution shifts to layer 2 via rollups and parallelization technologies. Enhanced data availability layers make batch submission more efficient—the industry continues exploring TPS targets ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands.
Additionally, multi-chain collaboration and cross-chain messaging will make throughput improvements less dependent on single-chain limits. Instead, networked specialization will handle larger transaction volumes. For users, this means faster confirmations, lower costs, and a more stable experience—but continued attention to security and decentralization remains vital.
Throughput measures the actual amount of data transmitted; bandwidth represents the theoretical maximum capacity. Think of bandwidth as a highway’s speed limit and throughput as the real volume of cars passing through. Throughput is typically lower than bandwidth due to network conditions and congestion.
They’re related but not identical. QPS means queries per second; throughput refers to data processed per second—they use different units. In blockchain contexts, throughput is usually measured in TPS (transactions per second), while QPS is more relevant for API calls. See “How Do Throughput, TPS, and Latency Differ?” above for details.
When network throughput hits its limit, transactions must queue for processing—confirmations take longer as a result. This is like toll booths during rush hour: the road’s capacity is fixed; more cars mean slower movement. Consider transacting during off-peak times or using Gate’s smart routing features to select higher-throughput chains.
Throughput differences stem from distinct technical architectures. Bitcoin averages about 7 TPS; Ethereum around 15 TPS; Solana can reach thousands of TPS. Key factors include block production speed, block size, and consensus mechanisms. High-throughput chains often trade off some decentralization or security—always assess your needs when choosing a blockchain.
Check average TPS, peak TPS, and average gas fees. Sufficient throughput usually means stable, low gas fees and fast confirmations; insufficient throughput leads to spiking gas costs and transaction backlogs. Use Gate’s explorer or on-chain tools for real-time metrics to help select optimal networks for your needs.


