thorughput

Throughput refers to the number of transactions a blockchain can process within a given period, typically measured in Transactions Per Second (TPS). This metric is similar to how many payments a cashier can process per second. Throughput directly affects transaction confirmation speed, the user experience in DeFi interactions, and the success rate of NFT minting. It is influenced by factors such as block time, block size, gas fee settings, parallel processing capabilities, and the implementation of Layer 2 networks. During periods of network congestion, insufficient throughput can lead to longer transaction queues and higher gas fees. Common approaches to increasing throughput include optimizing block intervals, expanding block capacity, enabling parallel execution, or adopting Layer 2 solutions like rollups.
Abstract
1.
Throughput measures a blockchain's capacity to process transactions per second (TPS), serving as a core performance metric.
2.
Higher throughput enables faster transaction confirmations and reduces network congestion risks.
3.
Different blockchains vary significantly in throughput: Ethereum processes ~15 TPS, while Solana handles thousands of TPS.
4.
Improving throughput is central to blockchain scalability, but must balance decentralization and security trade-offs.
5.
Throughput directly impacts user experience and gas fees in DeFi, NFTs, and other Web3 applications.
thorughput

What Is Throughput?

Throughput refers to the number of transactions a blockchain can process within a given time frame, typically measured as TPS (transactions per second). In essence, throughput reflects how many transactions are finalized each second—similar to how many payments a cashier can process per second. Higher throughput enables the blockchain to serve more users simultaneously.

On-chain, transactions are bundled into “blocks.” A block is like a page in an accounting ledger, written at regular intervals—this interval is called the “block time.” The maximum number of transactions a block can contain is its “block capacity.” Throughput is determined by both block time and block capacity.

Why Is Throughput Important?

Throughput directly impacts user experience and the feasibility of decentralized applications. Higher throughput means transactions are more likely to be included in a block quickly, reducing waiting times and minimizing failure rates.

In DeFi trading, insufficient throughput can cause longer queues, delayed order execution, and increased slippage. During NFT minting or popular airdrops, low throughput often leads to “block congestion,” where a large number of transactions pile up in the queue. In blockchain games, limited throughput may result in interaction delays, negatively affecting playability.

For exchange users, network throughput affects the confirmation speed for deposits and withdrawals. When selecting a withdrawal network on Gate, choosing a network with low throughput and high congestion can lead to slower confirmations and may require higher gas fees to expedite processing.

How Is Throughput Calculated?

A common method to estimate throughput (TPS) is:

Throughput (TPS) ≈ Number of transactions per block ÷ Block time (in seconds).

This provides a straightforward estimate:

  1. Use a block explorer to find the “block time” for the most recent blocks—this is the interval at which new ledger pages are written.
  2. Record the number of transactions included in each block—this reflects how many transactions are actually processed per ledger page.
  3. Divide the average number of transactions per block by the average block time to get an approximate TPS. For example, if there are 3,000 transactions per block and each block takes 12 seconds: TPS ≈ 3,000 ÷ 12 ≈ 250.

Note that many blockchains use “block capacity” to limit the number of transactions per block. For instance, Ethereum controls block complexity using a “gas limit,” so block capacity isn’t fixed by transaction count but by computational complexity—therefore, TPS will vary depending on transaction types.

What Factors Affect Blockchain Throughput?

Throughput is primarily determined by block time and block capacity. Shorter block times and larger capacities theoretically increase TPS, but both involve trade-offs with technical complexity and security.

Gas fees and transaction queues also influence effective throughput. During network congestion, the mempool acts as a “waiting room”—transactions with higher gas fees are prioritized for inclusion in the next block, while those with lower fees may be delayed.

System design and parallel processing are critical as well. Blockchains supporting parallel execution can process multiple non-conflicting transactions simultaneously, increasing throughput. Sharding works like dividing a road into multiple lanes—each shard processes its own set of transactions in parallel.

Hardware and network infrastructure impose practical limits. As higher throughput demands stronger hardware and bandwidth from nodes, participation requirements rise, potentially impacting decentralization.

How Do Throughput, TPS, and Latency Differ?

Throughput is commonly expressed as TPS; in most contexts, they are equivalent. However, “latency” refers to the time from submitting a transaction to its confirmation—like the wait from joining a queue until receiving your receipt.

A blockchain might have high throughput but still exhibit long latency if its block times are lengthy or confirmation requirements are strict. Conversely, low throughput combined with congestion significantly increases latency, even if block times remain constant.

How Can Blockchain Throughput Be Improved?

There are four main approaches: reducing block time, increasing block capacity, enabling parallel execution, and utilizing layer 2 solutions. Each method has trade-offs.

Shortening block time allows more frequent ledger updates but imposes higher demands on network synchronization and security. Increasing block capacity accommodates more transactions per block but can raise the burden on node operators.

Parallel execution boosts efficiency by processing non-conflicting transactions at the same time. Sharding splits transaction processing across multiple parallel sub-chains, raising overall throughput.

Layer 2 solutions (such as Rollups) batch multiple transactions off-chain or on sidechains before submitting a proof to the mainnet—akin to “batch checkouts.” As of 2025, most major public chains are increasingly relying on layer 2 technologies to significantly raise overall throughput while preserving mainnet security.

How Should Gate Users Operate During High-Throughput Scenarios?

  1. Before peak events (such as popular NFT mints or on-chain activities), ensure you have sufficient balance for gas fees—these incentivize your transaction’s inclusion in the next block.
  2. When withdrawing or depositing on Gate, prioritize networks or layer 2 solutions with higher throughput and lower congestion. For example, use supported layer 2 networks for stablecoin withdrawals to achieve faster confirmations.
  3. Check recent block times and transaction counts via a block explorer to monitor for growing queues; if congestion is apparent, consider raising your gas fee or avoiding peak periods.
  4. When conducting on-chain transactions (such as participating in DeFi), set appropriate slippage tolerance and deadlines to avoid failures or excessive price deviation due to insufficient throughput.

Always assess risk when handling funds. Setting gas fees too low may result in long delays; excessive fees increase costs. For cross-chain or layer 2 withdrawals, always verify contract addresses and network selection to prevent misdirected assets.

What Are the Security and Compliance Risks of High Throughput?

Pursuing higher throughput may raise hardware requirements for nodes, reducing participation and potentially undermining decentralization. Lower decentralization weakens censorship resistance and system robustness.

Faster block production under abnormal conditions may increase chain reorganization risks, impacting short-term finality. Parallel execution requires precise conflict management—poor design may introduce new vulnerabilities.

At the user level, blindly raising gas fees during congestion can result in unnecessary costs; using unfamiliar layer 2 or cross-chain solutions without proper due diligence exposes users to smart contract or operational risks. When depositing or withdrawing on Gate, always double-check networks and addresses and follow official announcements for risk updates.

The current trend is “modular design and layer 2 scaling.” Mainnets increasingly focus on security and data availability while execution shifts to layer 2 via rollups and parallelization technologies. Enhanced data availability layers make batch submission more efficient—the industry continues exploring TPS targets ranging from several thousand to tens of thousands.

Additionally, multi-chain collaboration and cross-chain messaging will make throughput improvements less dependent on single-chain limits. Instead, networked specialization will handle larger transaction volumes. For users, this means faster confirmations, lower costs, and a more stable experience—but continued attention to security and decentralization remains vital.

FAQ

What’s the difference between throughput and bandwidth?

Throughput measures the actual amount of data transmitted; bandwidth represents the theoretical maximum capacity. Think of bandwidth as a highway’s speed limit and throughput as the real volume of cars passing through. Throughput is typically lower than bandwidth due to network conditions and congestion.

Is throughput the same as QPS?

They’re related but not identical. QPS means queries per second; throughput refers to data processed per second—they use different units. In blockchain contexts, throughput is usually measured in TPS (transactions per second), while QPS is more relevant for API calls. See “How Do Throughput, TPS, and Latency Differ?” above for details.

Why do my transactions slow down during high-throughput periods?

When network throughput hits its limit, transactions must queue for processing—confirmations take longer as a result. This is like toll booths during rush hour: the road’s capacity is fixed; more cars mean slower movement. Consider transacting during off-peak times or using Gate’s smart routing features to select higher-throughput chains.

Why do different blockchains have such varied throughput?

Throughput differences stem from distinct technical architectures. Bitcoin averages about 7 TPS; Ethereum around 15 TPS; Solana can reach thousands of TPS. Key factors include block production speed, block size, and consensus mechanisms. High-throughput chains often trade off some decentralization or security—always assess your needs when choosing a blockchain.

How can I determine if a blockchain’s throughput is sufficient?

Check average TPS, peak TPS, and average gas fees. Sufficient throughput usually means stable, low gas fees and fast confirmations; insufficient throughput leads to spiking gas costs and transaction backlogs. Use Gate’s explorer or on-chain tools for real-time metrics to help select optimal networks for your needs.

A simple like goes a long way

Share

Related Glossaries
epoch
In Web3, "cycle" refers to recurring processes or windows within blockchain protocols or applications that occur at fixed time or block intervals. Examples include Bitcoin halving events, Ethereum consensus rounds, token vesting schedules, Layer 2 withdrawal challenge periods, funding rate and yield settlements, oracle updates, and governance voting periods. The duration, triggering conditions, and flexibility of these cycles vary across different systems. Understanding these cycles can help you manage liquidity, optimize the timing of your actions, and identify risk boundaries.
Degen
Extreme speculators are short-term participants in the crypto market characterized by high-speed trading, heavy position sizes, and amplified risk-reward profiles. They rely on trending topics and narrative shifts on social media, preferring highly volatile assets such as memecoins, NFTs, and anticipated airdrops. Leverage and derivatives are commonly used tools among this group. Most active during bull markets, they often face significant drawdowns and forced liquidations due to weak risk management practices.
BNB Chain
BNB Chain is a public blockchain ecosystem that uses BNB as its native token for transaction fees. Designed for high-frequency trading and large-scale applications, it is fully compatible with Ethereum tools and wallets. The BNB Chain architecture includes the execution layer BNB Smart Chain, the Layer 2 network opBNB, and the decentralized storage solution Greenfield. It supports a diverse range of use cases such as DeFi, gaming, and NFTs. With low transaction fees and fast block times, BNB Chain is well-suited for both users and developers.
Define Nonce
A nonce is a one-time-use number that ensures the uniqueness of operations and prevents replay attacks with old messages. In blockchain, an account’s nonce determines the order of transactions. In Bitcoin mining, the nonce is used to find a hash that meets the required difficulty. For login signatures, the nonce acts as a challenge value to enhance security. Nonces are fundamental across transactions, mining, and authentication processes.
Centralized
Centralization refers to an operational model where resources and decision-making power are concentrated within a small group of organizations or platforms. In the crypto industry, centralization is commonly seen in exchange custody, stablecoin issuance, node operation, and cross-chain bridge permissions. While centralization can enhance efficiency and user experience, it also introduces risks such as single points of failure, censorship, and insufficient transparency. Understanding the meaning of centralization is essential for choosing between CEX and DEX, evaluating project architectures, and developing effective risk management strategies.

Related Articles

The Future of Cross-Chain Bridges: Full-Chain Interoperability Becomes Inevitable, Liquidity Bridges Will Decline
Beginner

The Future of Cross-Chain Bridges: Full-Chain Interoperability Becomes Inevitable, Liquidity Bridges Will Decline

This article explores the development trends, applications, and prospects of cross-chain bridges.
2023-12-27 07:44:05
Solana Need L2s And Appchains?
Advanced

Solana Need L2s And Appchains?

Solana faces both opportunities and challenges in its development. Recently, severe network congestion has led to a high transaction failure rate and increased fees. Consequently, some have suggested using Layer 2 and appchain technologies to address this issue. This article explores the feasibility of this strategy.
2024-06-24 01:39:17
Sui: How are users leveraging its speed, security, & scalability?
Intermediate

Sui: How are users leveraging its speed, security, & scalability?

Sui is a PoS L1 blockchain with a novel architecture whose object-centric model enables parallelization of transactions through verifier level scaling. In this research paper the unique features of the Sui blockchain will be introduced, the economic prospects of SUI tokens will be presented, and it will be explained how investors can learn about which dApps are driving the use of the chain through the Sui application campaign.
2025-08-13 07:33:39