
A network node is a computer or server that participates in and maintains the operation of a network. In blockchain systems, nodes are responsible for storing the ledger, verifying and relaying transactions, and following the consensus rules. You can think of network nodes as stations in a city's transportation system—information flows between nodes along predetermined routes and is recorded accordingly.
The existence of network nodes allows anyone to independently verify on-chain data without relying on a single centralized authority. The more nodes there are, the stronger and more resilient the network becomes. Users from different regions can also connect to nearby nodes to reduce latency.
Network nodes communicate with each other via peer-to-peer connections. When users submit transactions to a node, those transactions enter a "mempool" (transaction pool) waiting to be included in a block. The node then relays these transactions to its neighboring nodes, enabling rapid propagation across the network.
When a new block is generated, nodes check whether it adheres to the network's established rules—known as the consensus mechanism, which ensures everyone agrees on the standard for recording data. This includes validating transaction signatures, ensuring sufficient balances, and verifying that the referenced previous block matches up. Once a block passes validation, the node adds it to its local ledger and continues broadcasting it outward.
This process ensures that any compliant node can independently maintain an identical view of the ledger, achieving transparent and tamper-resistant recordkeeping.
There are several common types of network nodes:
Full Nodes: Store the entire blockchain and state, enabling independent verification of all transactions and blocks without relying on external data sources. While highly secure, they require significant computational resources.
Light Nodes: Retain only essential summaries instead of full transaction history, querying full nodes for key information. Light nodes are suitable for devices or wallets with limited resources.
Validator Nodes: In Proof of Stake networks, validator nodes propose and attest to new blocks. They usually require staking tokens and maintaining high uptime. Their primary roles are block production and voting.
Archive Nodes: Extend full node functionality by keeping complete historical state snapshots, enabling queries for on-chain data at any past point. However, they demand greater storage and maintenance resources.
Different node types serve distinct purposes: full or archive nodes are preferred for querying and auditing; light nodes fit mobile wallets; validator nodes participate in consensus.
The number and geographic distribution of network nodes determine the degree of decentralization. The more distributed and diverse the operators, the lower the risk of single points of failure or unilateral censorship.
If network access is restricted in one region or an operator's service fails, other nodes elsewhere can continue propagating transactions and blocks, ensuring overall network availability. Decentralization does not mean absence of rules; it means "rules are maintained collectively by open-source software and participants," not controlled by a single entity.
The most common way is to have wallets or applications connect to a network node interface to read block and account states, submit transactions, and await confirmation. These interfaces typically take the form of RPC (Remote Procedure Call) services—which function like "a set of addresses and methods to query or submit requests to a node."
For example, when users deposit funds to an exchange, the exchange relies on network nodes to detect whether the transaction has been included in a block and whether it has reached the required number of confirmations. In Gate’s on-chain deposit workflow, the system continuously tracks transaction status using network nodes, following each blockchain’s confirmation rules until the deposit is finalized.
Before setting up a node, you need to clarify which blockchain you want to support and your intended use case. Different blockchains have varying resource requirements; storage needs can range from tens of gigabytes to several terabytes, with matching bandwidth and memory prerequisites.
On the hardware side, you generally need a stable CPU, ample memory, fast storage (such as SSDs for better sync and query speed), reliable networking, and a static IP address for maintaining connections. It’s also important to plan your operating system environment and security policies in advance.
On the software side, select the appropriate client (for example, Ethereum or Bitcoin ecosystem clients), and prepare your sync method, data directory, and logging/monitoring tools.
Step 1: Choose Your Blockchain and Client. Decide which chain you want to run and download its official or community-maintained client, verifying both source and signatures.
Step 2: Plan Storage and Networking. Allocate sufficient space for data directories, ensure stable upload/download bandwidth, and open necessary ports so your node can communicate externally.
Step 3: Initial Configuration. Set up data paths, network parameters, enable RPC interfaces if you want to provide external queries, and restrict allowed IPs for security.
Step 4: Launch and Sync. Start the client to begin synchronizing with other network nodes. Be patient—initial sync times can vary widely by blockchain.
Step 5: Health Monitoring. Monitor logs and metrics such as connection count, block height, latency, and disk usage; set up alerts as needed.
Step 6: Ongoing Maintenance. Regularly upgrade your client version, back up critical data, and perform rolling restarts to apply security patches—avoid falling behind on updates long-term.
Key costs include hardware, storage, bandwidth, and ongoing maintenance time. Archive nodes or heavy query loads are especially resource-intensive—individuals or small teams should assess their capabilities before proceeding.
Risks include: misconfiguration leading to exposed interfaces or malicious abuse; outdated versions causing compatibility or security issues; downtime due to power or network outages; validator or staking nodes face additional risks such as slashing penalties or private key leaks.
Extra caution is required for financial use cases—separate key management environments, restrict access sources, update and back up regularly to minimize security incidents.
Running your own network node means operating and maintaining your own data source—giving you greater control and transparency. Third-party RPC services offer node interfaces provided by service providers; these save operational effort but require trust in the provider’s availability and data integrity.
Self-hosted nodes offer verifiability and customization but demand higher investment; third-party solutions offer convenience but may be limited by rate restrictions, regional policies, or single-point dependency.
Many teams use a hybrid approach: critical queries or compliance functions rely on self-hosted nodes, while day-to-day traffic is distributed across third-party RPC services for redundancy and load balancing.
By 2025, several trends are emerging for network nodes: increased lightweight implementations make running nodes more accessible for mobile devices; greater diversity among clients enhances independence and security redundancy; advancements in data structures and sync methods reduce initial sync times and ease storage demands.
More applications now treat network nodes as verifiable data sources—combining local validation with multi-source comparison to improve censorship resistance and fault tolerance. Node monitoring, alerting systems, and automated maintenance are maturing as well—helping developers and institutions reliably connect to public blockchains.
Network nodes form the backbone of blockchain infrastructure—they handle storage, verification, and transaction propagation. Choosing which type to use depends on your needs: full or archive nodes for querying/auditing; light nodes for mobile or resource-limited scenarios; validator nodes for consensus participation. Self-hosted versus third-party RPC services each have trade-offs in cost, control, and reliability. For both individuals and organizations, best practice is to clearly define requirements, configure securely, maintain proactively—and treat your network node as a long-term verifiable data foundation.
No—a node is a computer running full blockchain software; an IP address is simply its identifier on the network. A single node may have multiple IP addresses; conversely, several nodes may share one IP address. Put simply: an IP is an address; a node is the “server” operating at that address.
Running your own node gives you complete control over your data—offering stronger privacy, faster access speeds, and freedom from third-party limits. However, RPC interfaces are more convenient since they require no maintenance. Your choice depends on your needs: if you value sovereignty, run your own node; if you want ease of use, use RPC services.
Absolutely—anyone with a computer, internet connection, and enough disk space can run a node. It’s not difficult: download the client software and follow setup instructions—no programming skills required. However, keep in mind that your machine needs to run 24/7, so consider electricity costs and hardware wear.
Blockchain data is distributed across all network nodes—losing data on one node does not affect the global network. However, you should regularly back up your personal data. Recommendations: safeguard your private keys, update your client software periodically, and monitor for abnormal traffic.


