MONTRA token team "ran away," causing the market cap to instantly evaporate by 80%, blamed on Iran's conscription.

March 6 News: The cryptocurrency project Montra Finance has recently come under controversy. The company announced that its newly launched MONTRA token development team had to abandon the project after being conscripted by Iran to participate in the war against the United States and Israel. Subsequently, the company’s official X account was deleted, and the website displayed a 404 error page.

Following the announcement, the market capitalization of the MONTRA token plummeted by approximately 80%, from $100,000 to $20,000, with only $1,200 in trading volume over the past six hours. Since its launch on February 25, the project’s market cap once reached $700,000 on the first day, but continued poor performance has raised doubts among investors about its sustainability.

Montra Finance claims to offer “decentralized quantitative trading based on Base,” but the sudden absence of the development team and lack of official information have sparked market skepticism. Some investors believe this could be a “exit scam” using war as an excuse. A user commented on social media, “It’s hard to tell whether the excuse is more credible or if the project itself is unreliable.”

Additionally, some users pointed out technical issues on the Montra Finance website, including wallet connection failures and additional verification requirements for investments, which further unsettled investors. Market analysts suggest that the project may be exploiting the current US-Israel-Iran conflict as a cover to justify fund withdrawals.

This incident also highlights the potential impact of geopolitical tensions on the crypto market. The war has caused capital outflows from Iran’s largest cryptocurrency exchange, Nobitex, and has led to a surge in betting activity on prediction markets like Polymarket, raising concerns about insider trading.

Overall, the MONTRA token incident serves as a warning to investors: in times of market volatility and geopolitical risks, it is crucial to exercise increased caution when choosing projects—especially those with opaque teams and disappearing official information, which require heightened vigilance.