Happy Sci has had a very clear positioning since its inception — a long-term non-profit charitable initiative with no plans to issue tokens and no fundraising activities. The official website clearly states that the founders are investing real money, and many current PhD students have actually benefited.



Trouble arises when a token with the same name suddenly appears, and the originally purely charitable nature is forcibly dragged into the controversy over token issuance. Although the project itself does not issue tokens, does not have tokens, and does not participate in token operations, the same name causes confusion in the market. Good intentions have been hijacked.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ShibaOnTheRunvip
· 7h ago
This is a classic case of a fake impersonator framing the real one. The original project was doing well, and suddenly a same-name coin was dragged into the mess. It's really frustrating.
View OriginalReply0
Frontrunnervip
· 7h ago
Having the same name really can ruin everything. I've seen this trick too many times.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHermitvip
· 7h ago
This name-collision tactic is really annoying; it's supposed to be purely charitable, yet it gets falsely accused.
View OriginalReply0
AllInAlicevip
· 7h ago
Oh no, this is a common blunder in crypto—too many riding on the coattails of the name.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)