2026-01-13 13:37:26

The套路 of MEME coins is actually not hard to see through. Claiming to be a community project, in reality, it is the founding team calling the shots—CTO leading the project direction, using false 'community consensus' to package decisions. The most surreal part is that multiple accounts are mobilized, seeming to have heated discussions, but in fact, it's all one person asking and answering themselves. Even more incredible is the collective FUD creating panic, then dumping prices to harvest profits. This trick is old and well-known, but every time someone falls for it. The real painful question is: in such projects, who is the true decision-maker? When will we see a truly transparent governance mechanism, instead of centralized operations disguised as a community?

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

10 Likes

Reward
10
5
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

RooftopReserver

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick again, that Q&A segment was really brilliant. --- This is ridiculous, using community branding to justify price suppression and harvesting? --- I'm truly fed up with people falling for this every time. --- Who insists on using the CTO title to intimidate others? --- Transparent governance is just a joke; it doesn't really exist. --- I've seen too many cases of self-entertainment with multiple accounts. --- Fake consensus to package decisions, and still have the nerve to call it community governance? --- The decision-makers are just a small group of people, why think so much? --- Playing multiple accounts by one person is really exhausting. --- Centralization is centralization, why pretend to be transparent?

View OriginalReply0

ChainMemeDealer

· 3h ago

The self-questioning and answering part directly hit the funny bone—playing multiple roles in community discussions by oneself, how boring must that be?

View OriginalReply0

WenMoon

· 3h ago

The part where they ask and answer themselves about the big and small accounts is really hilarious, a clearly fake community.

View OriginalReply0

UnluckyValidator

· 3h ago

It's the same old trick again, really boring. Haha, that self-answering part was hilarious. The level of acting by the main and secondary accounts is even worse than mine. I've seen through it long ago, just waiting to see who will get cut again. Instead of asking about transparent governance, it's better to ask how not to get scammed. I avoid projects like this; I really don't have that much confidence.

View OriginalReply0

OnchainDetective