From the moment of its inception, this project has not been about riding short-term trends in the crypto space. Its goal is to address the industry's biggest contradiction—the way traditional financial giants can enter the Web3 world.



People in the industry constantly talk about decentralization and resistance to censorship, but from the perspective of institutions holding trillions of dollars, this is simply unrealistic. Existing blockchain infrastructure is a nightmare for them.

Ethereum? Too transparent. Any large transaction can be thoroughly analyzed by on-chain data tools, exposing trading strategies and business secrets. Institutions absolutely cannot accept this. Conversely, privacy coins like Monero go too far, completely shielding regulatory oversight and getting blacklisted by compliance departments.

This creates a market gap.

The true solution is not a simple trade-off but integration—maintaining the liquidity of public chains while providing the privacy protections of private chains, and also meeting the compliance requirements of traditional finance. This path is extremely challenging, but it is also the only way to achieve large-scale adoption.

Technologically, the core breakthrough lies in redesigning the virtual machine. Choosing incompatibility in an era dominated by EVM requires real courage, but it also precisely demonstrates the project's ambition.

Unlike other public chains, this system abandons the inefficient operation mode of EVM and instead introduces zero-knowledge proof technology stacks. Zero-knowledge proofs are fundamentally cryptographic tools that can verify the validity of a transaction without revealing its specific details. This is not just a privacy feature but an industrial-grade privacy infrastructure.

In other words, institutions can perform large transactions and deploy complex contracts on-chain, with the entire process being publicly verifiable and auditable, yet completely hiding transaction details and business logic. This represents a kind of reconciliation among public chains, privacy chains, and traditional finance.
ETH-0,52%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ImpermanentPhobiavip
· 12h ago
Basically, they want to take a bite out of the traditional finance cake, but they also need to reassure the institutional players. The difficulty is indeed high. The needs of institutions and the ideals of the crypto world are inherently opposite. EVM should have been changed long ago. Zero-knowledge proofs are a promising path, but true implementation is the key. It's too early to boast now. Such integration solutions can work, but only with scale. Betting on this is less reliable than betting on the ecosystem.
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifiervip
· 12h ago
ngl the zero-knowledge stack narrative sounds solid on paper but... has anyone actually audited the implementation? because "theoretically sound" and "production-ready" are two very different beasts. institutional capital won't touch this until we see rigorous third-party validation, and i'm talking comprehensive formal verification here, not just some routine code review.
Reply0
SneakyFlashloanvip
· 12h ago
That's right, this is the real breaking point. The move to be incompatible with EVM is indeed tough, but only in this way can we shed those historical burdens. Institutions want a middle ground that can both be on-chain and maintain privacy; pure decentralization and complete privacy are too idealistic.
View OriginalReply0
BitcoinDaddyvip
· 12h ago
Basically, it's about wanting to get a piece of the institutional pie, but also making them think you're on the chain. Haha, finding that balance point is indeed quite difficult.
View OriginalReply0
BoredWatchervip
· 12h ago
To be honest, this approach is indeed different... You need big institutions' money to come in, make them feel secure, and also pass regulatory scrutiny. It feels like walking a tightrope. But can zero-knowledge proofs really live up to such high expectations? It seems a bit idealistic. Abandoning EVM definitely takes courage, but if you bet wrong, there won't be the previous ecosystem to back you up... Ultimately, it depends on the actual implementation.
View OriginalReply0
OffchainOraclevip
· 12h ago
That makes sense. The institutional entry has indeed been seriously underestimated. Really, the ZK path is the future; it's much more reliable than those things being hyped every day. But to be honest, can we really pass the compliance check? I'm still a bit skeptical. This is the true approach to solving the pain points, not just messing around. Those in the know understand that a balance must be found between privacy and regulation. Big institutions want transparent regulation but also privacy, and this time they've truly found a breakthrough.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)