The timing feels deliberate, not premature.



What stands out most is how AI execution gets positioned as foundational infrastructure rather than just another surface-level feature bolted onto the platform. That's a meaningful distinction.

The architecture here is clean—intent flows into automation, which then orchestrates multichain logic without friction. The experience doesn't feel bloated or over-engineered; there's no unnecessary explanation layer sitting between you and what actually works.

The real bet is on everyday utility. Not flashy, not theoretical. Just functional execution that people can actually use and build on.

This is the kind of approach that shapes how infrastructure gets adopted. Curious whether this shifts how people think about AI-driven automation in decentralized systems.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
CantAffordPancakevip
· 7h ago
ngl, this architecture design has some substance; it's not the kind of shell AI work.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleStalkervip
· 7h ago
ngl, this is the real thing that should be done, not just showy tricks. The infrastructure part really needs to be solid.
View OriginalReply0
PanicSellervip
· 7h ago
ngl This architecture design is indeed impressive, no fancy stuff included. Once the infrastructure is set up correctly, everything else becomes much easier. Other projects are just a bunch of superficial features piled together. It's really quite interesting, looking forward to seeing how it develops. If this round can be successfully run, the benchmarking will be extremely fierce. Multichain seamless integration sounds very smooth. Not bragging, but actually building things is the real skill. Betting on daily usability? Sure, I like this approach.
View OriginalReply0
BlockchainDecodervip
· 8h ago
From a technical architecture perspective, this design approach of treating AI as infrastructure rather than an embellishment is indeed noteworthy—based on my tracking data of multiple L1 projects, projects adopting this "intent→automation→execution" process generally have a 15-20% higher user retention rate. However, the real issue is whether it can run smoothly in real-world scenarios, rather than how elegant the architecture looks. At this point, I haven't yet seen enough on-chain active data to support this judgment.
View OriginalReply0
WealthCoffeevip
· 8h ago
Nah, this is the right approach—focusing on infrastructure ideas rather than just wrapping functionalities. The difference is significant.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)