2026-01-15 21:25:37

Interestingly, a major social platform has shut down those content incentive programs, with the official reason being to combat AI spam and the proliferation of low-quality content. Logically, this issue should also apply to creator revenue sharing mechanisms—monetary incentives are usually a breeding ground for inferior content. However, people have found that the platform's attitude towards creator revenue sharing is completely different. The contrast is quite obvious: the real issue seems not to be AI spam itself, but whether the platform can profit from it. In other words, as long as they can take a share, some problems become acceptable.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GweiObserver

· 6h ago

This is a typical case of selective enforcement; the platform doesn't care about content quality at all, only about whose pocket the money flows into.

View OriginalReply0

0xOverleveraged

· 6h ago

Uh, the king of double standards. The platform's operation is truly exceptional. To put it simply, things that benefit themselves are not considered issues, right?

View OriginalReply0

RugDocScientist

· 6h ago

Ha, well said. That's just how platforms are; they can make money and turn a blind eye. --- While cracking down on AI spam, they’re secretly siphoning off funds—double standards to the max. --- It’s incredible. As long as the money goes into their pockets, nothing else matters. --- This is where Web3 should stand up—exposing the hypocrisy of centralized platforms. --- I just want to ask, when will these bloodsuckers become transparent? --- They speak beautifully about principles, but in practice, everything is driven by interests. As expected. --- Seeing through it is seeing through it. Do they really think we’re all fools? --- Wait, can their incentive programs they’re shutting down also help them save money? That logic is even more absurd. --- Decentralized social might really be the only way out. If this keeps up, who will still trust them?

View OriginalReply0

SolidityStruggler

· 6h ago

It's the same old story again. Under the guise of cracking down on spam content, basically it's just that they are not making money anymore.

View OriginalReply0