2026-01-15 21:30:11

Coal bans force hard choices. Without affordable alternatives, households struggle to heat their homes through winter. Gas heating becomes a luxury many can't justify. The policy intent clashes with economic reality—regulatory action often outpaces infrastructure readiness and purchasing power.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

14 Likes

Reward
14
4
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

DeFiDoctor

· 7h ago

The consultation records show that this policy system has obvious clinical manifestations—insufficient infrastructure, inadequate purchasing power, and typical complications. Regulatory actions are always faster than the market recovery cycle, and the symptoms of capital outflow are clearly visible.

View OriginalReply0

CoffeeOnChain

· 7h ago

Typical top-down policymaking. How are ordinary people supposed to live? Banning coal is fine, but first we need to ensure people can afford heating.

View OriginalReply0

consensus_whisperer

· 8h ago

Typical well-intentioned but counterproductive move—banning coal isn't wrong, but cutting off people's heating right away... It really hits low-income families hard.

View OriginalReply0

SchrodingerAirdrop

· 8h ago

This is a typical top-down reckless command. Bro, the policymakers haven't even thought about how ordinary people will get through the winter.

View OriginalReply0