It may be okay to entrust data processing to experts, but what happens if the original data ends up in the hands of a specific individual or organization? No matter how many Web3 projects emerge, if the data owner simply says "no," it's over. It collapses like a castle made of sand. Project operation? That's out of the question. The same applies to InfoFi, and honestly, any Web3 project will face the same problem if data sovereignty is not truly decentralized. That's the real key.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PhantomMiner
· 3h ago
Basically, the real issue is who holds the data rights; everything else is just superficial.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHunter007
· 3h ago
In plain terms, it's a false proposition. No matter how perfectly those scattered data points draw the big pie chart, it's useless.
View OriginalReply0
MagicBean
· 3h ago
In plain terms, the centralization of data power is a ticking time bomb that no matter how fancy Web3 gets, can't be saved.
View OriginalReply0
WhaleInTraining
· 3h ago
Ultimately, it's still a problem with the data set. After all this time, how many truly decentralized Web3 projects are there? I think most of them are just rebranded centralized systems.
It may be okay to entrust data processing to experts, but what happens if the original data ends up in the hands of a specific individual or organization? No matter how many Web3 projects emerge, if the data owner simply says "no," it's over. It collapses like a castle made of sand. Project operation? That's out of the question. The same applies to InfoFi, and honestly, any Web3 project will face the same problem if data sovereignty is not truly decentralized. That's the real key.