The dead internet theory isn't just a meme anymore—it's happening right before our eyes. Social platforms are drowning in bot networks, making it nearly impossible to distinguish signal from noise. You scroll, you see engagement, but is anyone real on the other end?
And that's just the beginning. Digital IDs loom on the horizon, and here's the uncomfortable part: once that infrastructure exists, the lines between anonymity and surveillance blur entirely. The blockchain space preaches decentralization, yet we're watching centralized platforms weaponize automation while governments quietly prepare their own control mechanisms.
Some builders approach these issues like surgeons—careful, thoughtful, considering second and third-order effects. Others? They wield chainsaws. Maybe that's calculated. Maybe it's not. Either way, the ecosystem needs to ask itself: are we building trustless systems to escape manipulation, or just creating new layers for it to hide beneath?
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
14 Likes
Reward
14
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
BottomMisser
· 9h ago
Is it humans or machines flooding the screens? Who the hell knows
---
With the arrival of digital IDs, anonymity has become a joke, and the Web3 whitepapers are all nonsense
---
There are too few truly dedicated builders; most are just swinging chainsaws and chopping randomly
---
Trustless system? Uh... it's just a scam in disguise
---
I just want to know, who is chatting with whom
---
Platforms that shout the loudest about decentralization are actually the best at playing the control game
---
The information war has reached this point, and we’ve all become noise in the signal-to-noise ratio
---
Instead of blaming bot networks, ask yourself whether you still believe in anything
View OriginalReply0
ChainDoctor
· 9h ago
Really, bots have already surpassed humans
---
As for digital ID, it’s called convenience in the nicest terms and a trap in the harshest
---
We’ve been shouting about decentralization, but the platforms are playing more tricks than the government
---
Chainsaw builders are those who just rush in; the consequences? We’ll talk about that in a bit
---
Trust systems stacking on trust systems—how long can this cycle go on?
---
A round of fake data; who can still distinguish real interactions from fake ones?
---
Building a new monitoring layer under the banner of decentralization? This plot is just too ironic
---
Feels like we’re just giving old tricks a new skin with blockchain
---
Surgeon and chainsaw are just about whether to consider the consequences or not
---
The line between anonymity and surveillance has long disappeared
View OriginalReply0
HalfBuddhaMoney
· 9h ago
It's fucking ironic. We shout for decentralization every day, but we're still caught in the middle of big platform bots and government surveillance.
As soon as digital ID cards come out, anonymity is completely dead... Is blockchain truly the savior or just a new scam? I can't see through it anymore.
View OriginalReply0
wrekt_but_learning
· 9h ago
Wow, now the entire screen is filled with bots, and it really feels incredible.
The saying that the internet is dead is not a joke; the entire feed is just fake accounts acting out scenes.
Once digital IDs are introduced, everyone's privacy will be completely gone, right? The blockchain folks talk about decentralization, but they get played by platforms to death.
Honestly, no one can tell whether the original posters are trying to solve problems or just creating another layer of new scams.
I genuinely think all of this is a bit ridiculous. Are we building roads or digging pits?
View OriginalReply0
FalseProfitProphet
· 9h ago
Really, now when I scroll through Twitter, I don't even know if I'm chatting with a robot.
I think Digital ID is truly terrifying; eventually, anonymity will become a luxury.
The people in the blockchain circle keep shouting about decentralization, but aren't they just being led around by big platforms?
The difference between the architect and Chainsaw Guy is that one wants to cut long-term profits, while the other just copies everything.
Are we really building a trustless system, or are we just nesting brainwashing?
The dead internet theory isn't just a meme anymore—it's happening right before our eyes. Social platforms are drowning in bot networks, making it nearly impossible to distinguish signal from noise. You scroll, you see engagement, but is anyone real on the other end?
And that's just the beginning. Digital IDs loom on the horizon, and here's the uncomfortable part: once that infrastructure exists, the lines between anonymity and surveillance blur entirely. The blockchain space preaches decentralization, yet we're watching centralized platforms weaponize automation while governments quietly prepare their own control mechanisms.
Some builders approach these issues like surgeons—careful, thoughtful, considering second and third-order effects. Others? They wield chainsaws. Maybe that's calculated. Maybe it's not. Either way, the ecosystem needs to ask itself: are we building trustless systems to escape manipulation, or just creating new layers for it to hide beneath?