$REDWOODJS (CA: 2uS7QJ27gS8UfCWPTMh8qBE5FS8K7NjAJTTnvU3yBAGS) token distribution shows snipers controlling 11.8% of total supply with no insider allocations reported by devsnightmare. Risk wallet operates as a significant holder in the ecosystem.
Bubble map analysis reveals no concentrated whale clusters, but CEX exposure is notable. Liquidity distribution shows 56.4% across centralized exchange wallets. Major exchange-funded wallets account for substantial portions: around 22.9% from certain protocol partners, 14.8% from compliance platforms, and 9.5% from alternative venues—marking elevated exchange concentration risk. This centralized liquidity pattern warrants monitoring for potential dump pressure.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
13 Likes
Reward
13
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GrayscaleArbitrageur
· 7h ago
56.4% on the exchange... How long will it take to break even?
View OriginalReply0
SmartContractRebel
· 7h ago
56.4% exchange concentration? That’s a market crash waiting to happen, brother.
---
Snipers at 11.8% isn’t a big deal; I’m really worried about those exchange folks running away together.
---
Not having whale accumulation is actually more dangerous. Retail investors really should be cautious.
---
Concentrated in CEXs, this risk is huge...
---
Devsnightmare said there’s no internal distribution, which I somewhat believe, but the exchange risk needs to be closely watched.
---
Honestly, this distribution looks weird. I really don’t understand what project teams are thinking with centralized liquidity.
---
11.8% snipers? That’s nothing; the real killer is that 56.4% figure.
---
Compliance platforms taking 14.8%? What are they even doing?
---
Not having whales makes me even more uneasy... feels like the risk is dispersed but more covert.
---
I’ve known for a while that exchange concentration would be deadly. RedwoodJS really went all out this time.
---
Almost 50% from three sources combined; something’s bound to go wrong.
View OriginalReply0
ChainWanderingPoet
· 7h ago
Once again, it's the same pattern of high CEX concentration... 56.4% in exchange wallets, isn't that a warning light indicating a potential dump at any time?
View OriginalReply0
LiquidityHunter
· 7h ago
56.4% of liquidity is stacked in exchange wallets. How big is the arbitrage space... This morning, I also discovered a new hunting ground for arbitrage bots.
View OriginalReply0
StakeWhisperer
· 8h ago
Snipers took 11.8%, be careful with this... 56% of the liquidity is held by exchanges, it feels like a dump could happen at any time.
View OriginalReply0
RegenRestorer
· 8h ago
NGL, this token distribution is a bit weak, with such a high CEX concentration, it's only a matter of time before a dump occurs.
$REDWOODJS (CA: 2uS7QJ27gS8UfCWPTMh8qBE5FS8K7NjAJTTnvU3yBAGS) token distribution shows snipers controlling 11.8% of total supply with no insider allocations reported by devsnightmare. Risk wallet operates as a significant holder in the ecosystem.
Bubble map analysis reveals no concentrated whale clusters, but CEX exposure is notable. Liquidity distribution shows 56.4% across centralized exchange wallets. Major exchange-funded wallets account for substantial portions: around 22.9% from certain protocol partners, 14.8% from compliance platforms, and 9.5% from alternative venues—marking elevated exchange concentration risk. This centralized liquidity pattern warrants monitoring for potential dump pressure.