The stablecoin payment infrastructure track is currently being deeply cultivated by many projects. What’s most attractive is their on-chain payment solutions — which completely change the way funds flow and clearly demonstrate the ambition to build a new generation of global financial infrastructure.
Compared to traditional USDT transfers, the fees are incredibly expensive. Switching to the new generation stablecoin payment chain, transaction fees are ridiculously low, and confirmations are almost instant, providing a truly different experience. This high efficiency is especially evident in cross-border payments and frequent trading scenarios.
Ecosystem applications are also rapidly expanding — integrating with mainstream lending protocols and liquidity mining platforms. Users can earn yields while making payments, which is a pretty innovative design. Many players are already prioritizing these low-cost solutions when switching assets between DeFi applications.
If you often operate on-chain, it’s worth trying out, and community discussions are quite active. In the long run, optimizing payment costs will indeed be a key point in next-stage competition.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
16 Likes
Reward
16
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
GraphGuru
· 9h ago
Instant confirmation? Isn't this exactly what I've been wanting? Finally, someone has got the payment part right.
Hurry up and try it out. The fees for traditional USDT are really outrageous.
You can mine while paying, this operation is quite interesting.
Which project is the most aggressive? Please recommend.
Cost optimization is the key; all other tricks are pointless.
View OriginalReply0
SatoshiLeftOnRead
· 9h ago
Instant confirmation? I just want to know how the real TPS performs, whether it's just hype again.
---
I've heard too much about low transaction fees, but the key is whether the liquidity is deep enough.
---
The ecosystem expansion sounds good, but it feels like the same old story. What about the actual trading volume?
---
Cross-border payments are indeed needed, but with so many projects in this space, who will make it to the end is hard to say.
---
In DeFi, switching assets first prefers low-cost options? Normal operation, this isn't a selling point.
---
I've experienced a few, just faster, but nothing groundbreaking.
---
Optimizing payment costs is important, but infrastructure stability is the real ceiling.
---
How many times has the "instant confirmation" thing been hyped... sometimes it's just not that fast.
---
Low fees are an advantage, but the key is whether anyone actually uses it.
---
Again talking about building global financial infrastructure, romantic stories are not worth much.
View OriginalReply0
gas_fee_therapist
· 9h ago
Confirming this point quickly is indeed top, but can the ecosystem applications really take off?
---
Low fees sound great, but the key is having liquidity.
---
Another hype-driven track? Let’s wait and see who survives until next year.
---
I’ve tried it, and it’s definitely much faster than USDT, but the ecosystem is still very empty.
---
Payment optimization is good, but can these projects withstand competition?
---
The returns are somewhat attractive, but the risks need to be carefully considered.
---
Always hearing about new infrastructure, but in the end? It still depends on actual adoption rates.
---
I’m optimistic about on-chain payments, but there are too many projects, mixed quality.
---
Cheap transaction fees are real, I’ve used them, but the interaction is a bit complicated.
---
Why wait for a new chain? Optimization can be done now.
View OriginalReply0
SleepTrader
· 9h ago
Confirming this thing in seconds is indeed satisfying, but how many actually survive?
---
Low fees sound appealing, but the key to victory lies in the ecosystem's life and death.
---
I just want to know how many of these projects will still be around in six months.
---
Optimizing payment costs is correct, but who will guarantee stability?
---
Cross-border payments have been really exploited by traditional finance, finally someone is taking it seriously.
---
The ecosystem integration is so fast, it sounds a bit like rushing for quick gains.
---
I've tried a few, and the experience truly surpasses USDT, but I'm worried about liquidity sufficiency.
---
Building global financial infrastructure? Let's see if it survives until next year first.
---
Cheap transaction fees are real, but what about security? Has anyone conducted a thorough audit?
---
Wait, are the vaults behind these projects really stable?
The stablecoin payment infrastructure track is currently being deeply cultivated by many projects. What’s most attractive is their on-chain payment solutions — which completely change the way funds flow and clearly demonstrate the ambition to build a new generation of global financial infrastructure.
Compared to traditional USDT transfers, the fees are incredibly expensive. Switching to the new generation stablecoin payment chain, transaction fees are ridiculously low, and confirmations are almost instant, providing a truly different experience. This high efficiency is especially evident in cross-border payments and frequent trading scenarios.
Ecosystem applications are also rapidly expanding — integrating with mainstream lending protocols and liquidity mining platforms. Users can earn yields while making payments, which is a pretty innovative design. Many players are already prioritizing these low-cost solutions when switching assets between DeFi applications.
If you often operate on-chain, it’s worth trying out, and community discussions are quite active. In the long run, optimizing payment costs will indeed be a key point in next-stage competition.