With the $100M Incentive Program on the table, the real question is: which assets actually make the cut? There's a lot at stake here. Should we focus on established blue-chip tokens? Or is this the moment to back emerging protocols with genuine utility? The community's already debating this hard—and rightfully so. Better choices now mean better ecosystem momentum down the line. What's your take? Which assets do you think deserve the spotlight in this round?

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
BearMarketHustlervip
· 5h ago
Investing 100 million USD still depends on who truly has substance
View OriginalReply0
DaoTherapyvip
· 5h ago
Blue-chip stability is stable, but early-stage projects are the real gold mine—it's all about who dares to bet.
View OriginalReply0
RealYieldWizardvip
· 5h ago
Honestly, blue-chip coins are stable, but if this wave still only involves pouring money into those top projects... it's really a bit of a waste of this opportunity.
View OriginalReply0
BuyTheTopvip
· 5h ago
Blue chips are stable but boring; you still have to bet on new projects. Only what is truly useful can survive until the end.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • بالعربية
  • Português (Brasil)
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Español
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Русский
  • 繁體中文
  • Українська
  • Tiếng Việt