A managing partner of a top-tier Silicon Valley venture capital firm recently made an important statement—advocating for Congress to accelerate the passage of the "CLARITY Act." Essentially, this bill aims to do one thing: provide clear regulatory exemptions for crypto developers so they won't be arbitrarily caught up in securities law lawsuits just for releasing decentralized software.



Behind this call is the industry's ongoing biggest challenge: uncertainty. Under the vague regulatory framework where "everything could potentially be a security," developers are cautious, and institutional capital dares not to enter en masse. One might say, this situation is like construction in the dark—no matter how good the blueprints are, no one dares to truly start building.

You'll find that this is no longer just pure industry lobbying. The relationship between the entire crypto world and mainstream regulatory systems is subtly shifting—from the past of "resistance and evasion" to gradually "dialogue and framework building." Once the CLARITY Act is truly advanced, the market can gradually emerge from the long-standing "regulatory cloud" and enter a new phase of "lawful operation."

This turning point means very different things for different projects. For most crypto projects, a clear legal framework is a "release from constraints"—finally, they can operate freely. But for projects that have embedded "compliance" into their protocol from the start, like Dusk Network, the situation is quite the opposite. The new rules are more like "stage lighting"—things they quietly did before now will be seen; and like "moat reinforcement"—things others are just starting to adapt to, they are already familiar with.

In other words, Dusk has never been a lone pioneer with a forward-looking layout. When the new rules are truly established, it might instead become the most adaptable standard-setter. This shift in position exemplifies how long-term strategic choices demonstrate their value at critical moments.

Returning to the core of the CLARITY Act, what is its deeper meaning? Simply put, it finally provides clear standards for "construction permits." Developers don't need exemption from all regulation; they need to know where their bottom line is. When the legal framework becomes clear, innovation can proceed more steadily. For the entire industry, this marks a natural transition from wild growth to regulated development.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ChainWallflowervip
· 6h ago
Wait, is this article a sponsored post for Dusk Network? The part about compliance genes feels a bit forced... But on the other hand, clearly defining the legal framework is indeed a good thing.
View OriginalReply0
MysteryBoxBustervip
· 6h ago
Honestly, the CLARITY bill has to be passed before it counts. People are still hyping it now. --- Projects that have been compliant from the start are truly hilarious—feels like an easy win. --- The metaphor of construction in darkness is perfect; developers now have that mindset. --- Dusk's plan has been laid out long ago, just waiting for new rules to validate it. --- Uncertainty is the biggest killer, more uncomfortable than strict regulations. --- The shift from confrontation to dialogue is quite insightful. --- Having clear bottom lines actually makes it easier to innovate with peace of mind. This logic makes sense. --- Venture capital is only now pushing this—do they really have confidence, or are there other plans? --- Institutional capital has been waiting for signals; CLARITY might be that critical point. --- The moat of compliance—what if the new rules change again?
View OriginalReply0
0xLostKeyvip
· 6h ago
Finally, someone has spoken clearly: regulation is not the enemy; uncertainty is. --- So projects that have already been compliant are really about to take off; their moat is indeed deep. --- The metaphor of construction in darkness is brilliant. Even at this moment, who still wants to hide? Impossible. --- What are other projects panicking about? Projects like Dusk have actually stabilized. --- Once CLARITY passes, the entire landscape will change completely. The game rules are finally becoming clear.
View OriginalReply0
SelfMadeRuggeevip
· 7h ago
Isn't this just Silicon Valley trying to legitimize itself? If I had known it would be like this, I would have just had a proper chat from the start. Projects like Dusk, which have long been compliant, are really enjoyable. Others are only now starting to adapt, and they've already played out. Clarifying the regulatory framework makes innovation more stable? Sounds good, but let's first see if CLARITY can really pass. Another mention of Clarity and framework—I'm tired of this narrative. The real test is in execution. It feels like this article is just trying to boost the reputation of compliant projects. Dusk might actually be the big winner. The metaphor of construction in darkness is excellent; indeed, everyone is waiting for that light to turn on now. From confrontation to dialogue? It's just a compromise between powers. Developers still need to be cautious. Projects with compliance embedded in their DNA are about to take off. If I had known earlier, I would have focused on finding these kinds. Clear bottom lines are more valuable than exemption from regulation. I agree with that. I wonder if this bill can truly boost the market. It seems we need more explicit signals before going all in.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)