The reward structure on X turned out way smaller than anticipated. Compared to how YouTube compensates creators, the payouts here are surprisingly modest. Consider this: an article hitting 118 million views—genuinely viral by any standard, heavily quoted, bookmarked across the platform—netted just $4.5k. That gap between engagement metrics and actual earnings is pretty striking when you stack it against other major social platforms.

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 5
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretfulvip
· 12h ago
180 million plays only earn $4,500? X's distribution method is really outrageous, I'd rather mess around on YouTube.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCryingvip
· 12h ago
180 million clicks only 4.5k? This number is utterly ridiculous, YouTube creators have long since abandoned it.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguyvip
· 12h ago
180 million views only equal $4.5K? This X model is really outrageous, no wonder big influencers are moving to YouTube.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperervip
· 12h ago
180 million views only 4.5k, really outrageous... YouTube has gone bankrupt long ago
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivorvip
· 12h ago
180 million views only 4.5k? That's just ridiculous. YouTube has already spoiled you long ago.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)