The reward structure on X turned out way smaller than anticipated. Compared to how YouTube compensates creators, the payouts here are surprisingly modest. Consider this: an article hitting 118 million views—genuinely viral by any standard, heavily quoted, bookmarked across the platform—netted just $4.5k. That gap between engagement metrics and actual earnings is pretty striking when you stack it against other major social platforms.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
19 Likes
Reward
19
5
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTRegretful
· 12h ago
180 million plays only earn $4,500? X's distribution method is really outrageous, I'd rather mess around on YouTube.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeCrying
· 12h ago
180 million clicks only 4.5k? This number is utterly ridiculous, YouTube creators have long since abandoned it.
View OriginalReply0
ReverseFOMOguy
· 12h ago
180 million views only equal $4.5K? This X model is really outrageous, no wonder big influencers are moving to YouTube.
View OriginalReply0
consensus_whisperer
· 12h ago
180 million views only 4.5k, really outrageous... YouTube has gone bankrupt long ago
View OriginalReply0
RugpullSurvivor
· 12h ago
180 million views only 4.5k? That's just ridiculous. YouTube has already spoiled you long ago.
The reward structure on X turned out way smaller than anticipated. Compared to how YouTube compensates creators, the payouts here are surprisingly modest. Consider this: an article hitting 118 million views—genuinely viral by any standard, heavily quoted, bookmarked across the platform—netted just $4.5k. That gap between engagement metrics and actual earnings is pretty striking when you stack it against other major social platforms.