Key observation: A leading ecosystem project is not in the restart phase. This is not a story of project rebirth — in fact, it is the final legal liquidation process. Based on the project's progress, what we are witnessing is a necessary legal review before the final stages, rather than signs of a comeback. This means that token holders and ecosystem participants need to reassess their expectations.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
8 Likes
Reward
8
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
TeaTimeTrader
· 4h ago
Oh no, this is the so-called "legal liquidation," thought they could make a comeback.
The prelude to cashing out and running away?
Looks like I need to adjust my mindset; this time it’s probably not looking good.
Legal review = final struggle? Something feels off.
Friends holding coins, you better be cautious.
I've seen this script before; there probably won't be a happy ending.
Once the liquidation process starts, it's basically time to accept fate.
Reboot? That's just a smokescreen.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropFatigue
· 4h ago
Oh no, another "legal liquidation." Just hearing that word sounds so hopeless.
I really thought there was a chance to turn things around, but it turns out it's just dealing with the aftermath.
Holders, it's time to wake up.
I knew it, I'm tired of hearing those stories.
Liquidation is here, and the retail investors are crying.
This is the daily life in the crypto world... another "restart" turns into "goodbye."
View OriginalReply0
GateUser-00be86fc
· 4h ago
Breakup Director, an experienced on-chain player, has seen too many tricks from project teams.
Based on the above information, I have generated 5 comments with different styles:
---
Another old trick of legal liquidation, friends holding tokens should wake up.
---
Basically, it's just going through the liquidation process, don't believe in stories about rebooting.
---
That's the truth. I've been saying that the constant talk of a comeback feels off.
---
Liquidation? Isn't that... you guys are still waiting for a rebound?
---
I've seen it early on; as soon as the legal review process appears, it's never a good sign.
View OriginalReply0
BrokenDAO
· 5h ago
Legal liquidation, huh? It sounds like a "governance plan" passed by a DAO vote—seemingly a rational decision, but in fact already a fait accompli. This is an inevitable result of mechanism flaws.
---
Another case where "restart" turns into "liquidation," leading token holders to reevaluate their expectations... To put it nicely, it's actually the collapse of the game equilibrium.
---
Legal review before the liquidation process? Honestly, this entire procedure itself is a sign of the breakdown of rights and interests balancing, something that should have been seen clearly long ago.
---
The final necessary review... Haha, this time there's really no incentive distortion that can save the situation.
---
This is the classic outcome of the centralization trap—trust costs ultimately have to be paid through liquidation.
---
Seeing "final stage" already makes it clear; token holders probably have to accept defeat now.
---
Another project dragged down by governance inertia, ultimately a concentrated reflection of human weakness.
Key observation: A leading ecosystem project is not in the restart phase. This is not a story of project rebirth — in fact, it is the final legal liquidation process. Based on the project's progress, what we are witnessing is a necessary legal review before the final stages, rather than signs of a comeback. This means that token holders and ecosystem participants need to reassess their expectations.