"Native Bitcoin L2" and "sustainable yield"—we've heard these promises too many times, and they all ended in failure. Most of the so-called Bitcoin L2 solutions on the market are just layer-2 solutions with different appearances, relying on centralized cross-chain bridges and single sequencers.



But this raises an interesting question: if existing solutions all have these pain points, how should the next generation of Bitcoin L2 break through? Is the core in solving decentralized verification, sequencing mechanisms, or cross-chain security? How much room is there for innovation in technology stacks and economic models? These are the areas worth exploring in depth.
BTC0,17%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 4
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
MEVictimvip
· 4h ago
Tired of this rhetoric, another "revolutionary" plan, but in the end, it's still the same old story.
View OriginalReply0
degenwhisperervip
· 4h ago
Tired of this spiel? Always about decentralization and sustainability, talking up a storm, but isn't it just a rug in the end?
View OriginalReply0
RugPullAlarmvip
· 4h ago
Here we go again, with the "sustainable yield" rhetoric. Last year, I analyzed the fund flow of a leading L2, and the concentration of large addresses was as high as 73%. Do they still dare to boast about decentralization? On-chain data never lies; it all depends on whether the project team dares to disclose wallet addresses.
View OriginalReply0
Degen4Breakfastvip
· 4h ago
It's the same old story... I just want to know who can still fool us next time.
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin

Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)