Nothing beats putting your money where your mouth is. When project teams actually hold their own tokens—especially with long-term lockups—it sends a real signal to token holders. Skin in the game changes everything.
Now, I'm not saying every dev needs to drop 10% of their portfolio into the project token. I get the practicality issues around that. But the principle matters: team incentives and community incentives need to point in the same direction. Without it, you're just hoping people care about your project, not ensuring it.
The specifics vary by project stage, market conditions, and individual circumstances. But when teams are genuinely committed holders, not just maintainers, the whole ecosystem tends to run smoother.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
9 Likes
Reward
9
4
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
CoconutWaterBoy
· 2h ago
Basically, it's whether the dev has actually invested real money; if not, it's all nonsense.
View OriginalReply0
alpha_leaker
· 2h ago
It's a valid point, but the reality is that most teams simply can't achieve it. No matter how loudly the slogans are shouted, it doesn't help.
View OriginalReply0
LuckyBearDrawer
· 2h ago
That's true, but I've seen too many project teams that sound good but secretly dump tokens... Truly committed teams with skin in the game are indeed rare.
View OriginalReply0
MerkleMaid
· 2h ago
That's right, I really can't trust projects where the team doesn't hold any tokens... That's just empty talk.
Nothing beats putting your money where your mouth is. When project teams actually hold their own tokens—especially with long-term lockups—it sends a real signal to token holders. Skin in the game changes everything.
Now, I'm not saying every dev needs to drop 10% of their portfolio into the project token. I get the practicality issues around that. But the principle matters: team incentives and community incentives need to point in the same direction. Without it, you're just hoping people care about your project, not ensuring it.
The specifics vary by project stage, market conditions, and individual circumstances. But when teams are genuinely committed holders, not just maintainers, the whole ecosystem tends to run smoother.