Recent happiness comes from these small details—tracking the operational logic of each address, pondering the tactics of different players, and observing how projects transition from release to differentiation. Making money or not is another matter; it's purely for entertainment.
Once a project is listed on a contract, you can generally see the clues. Without strong support from big players, or if the big players lose the will to continue, these projects often just stop there. The most heartbreaking part is, now trying to rely on retail consensus to truly pump the price? Difficult. Watching the K-line charts of various projects, I always imagine some unrealistic scenarios—retail investors uniting to counterattack—but reality is often colder.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
AirdropChaser
· 01-24 15:49
This is our daily routine, the story of刷盘子never runs out of new acts.
View OriginalReply0
ChainSherlockGirl
· 01-24 12:56
Haha, tracking wallet addresses is really addictive. Based on my analysis, the psychology of big players is more exciting than watching dramas.
---
When the whales run, the project is doomed. No suspense, the data shows everything.
---
Retail investors pushing the market? Bro, you're overthinking it. Reality is much harsher.
---
What's interesting is that analyzing on-chain data to reverse-engineer the logic behind it is way more fun than making money.
---
K-line charts are the most deceptive; plot twists in the story will never come.
---
As soon as I see the contract, I know how this project died. It's heartbreaking.
---
Wallet addresses tell the truth. I see through the thoughts of the big players, haha.
---
Instead of hoping retail investors will make a comeback, it's better to study how the big players cut profits. Now that's entertainment.
---
The most interesting moment is when the project starts to differentiate; all the clues are revealed.
---
Want to pump the market through consensus? To be continued. The ending has been written.
View OriginalReply0
MEVSandwichVictim
· 01-23 20:18
When the funds are gone, it's over. Retail investors want to band together for a comeback? Haha, dream on.
View OriginalReply0
digital_archaeologist
· 01-22 03:56
Watching the tricks of the market maker is much more comfortable than reading K-line charts. Anyway, I no longer expect to make money or not.
Really, now retail investors banding together is just a joke. When a powerful player makes a move, everything collapses.
Once the contract is on the chain, everything becomes clear. Without a strong market maker, you're just waiting to die.
Forget it, just watch the show. The story behind the chart is more interesting than the rise and fall itself.
Retail investors' counterattack? Wake up, these days the market makers have already written the script.
Chasing addresses to operate is more exciting than trading coins yourself. Those in the know all understand this trick.
Reality is indeed cold, but once you see through it, it’s not so painful.
View OriginalReply0
RugpullAlertOfficer
· 01-22 03:50
Oh no, this is the game we play every day. Retail investors dream of a reversal, but when they wake up, they're still the little guys.
View OriginalReply0
retroactive_airdrop
· 01-22 03:47
If the founder dies, the project dies. This is an eternal truth, right?
View OriginalReply0
GasGuzzler
· 01-22 03:44
Haha, if the casino is gone, it's all over. Retail investors shouldn't even think about consensus.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropHarvester
· 01-22 03:28
When the big players are gone, no one will support the market. I've seen through this long ago.
Recent happiness comes from these small details—tracking the operational logic of each address, pondering the tactics of different players, and observing how projects transition from release to differentiation. Making money or not is another matter; it's purely for entertainment.
Once a project is listed on a contract, you can generally see the clues. Without strong support from big players, or if the big players lose the will to continue, these projects often just stop there. The most heartbreaking part is, now trying to rely on retail consensus to truly pump the price? Difficult. Watching the K-line charts of various projects, I always imagine some unrealistic scenarios—retail investors uniting to counterattack—but reality is often colder.