Signal vs Telegram comparison reveals two philosophies: Signal prioritizes absolute privacy with default end-to-end encryption and zero data storage as a non-profit, while Telegram offers 200,000-member groups, channels, monetization tools, and web access but requires manual encryption activation.
Signal vs Telegram: Quick Overview
Signal is a secure messaging, voice, and video-calling app created by the Signal Foundation, a non-profit organization. Its code is hosted on GitHub as open-source software. Signal prioritizes privacy and security, with encryption by default across the platform and no data stored on Signal’s servers. It serves 900 million users globally who value maximum privacy over feature richness.
Telegram is a cloud-based messaging and chat app popular with online communities and forums. Available for mobile, desktop, and web, Telegram has become one of the world’s most popular apps with 900 million users. It features channel format for growing subscriber bases and broadcasting livestreams, content, videos, and messages to large groups, plus simple built-in monetization tools.
The signal vs telegram choice fundamentally comes down to one question: Which matters more to you—absolute privacy or powerful content and community features?
Chat & Community Features Comparison
Signal’s Approach
Signal is a secure messaging platform growing rapidly. People are drawn to it for private communication options—it mixes good security with user-friendly features making it easy to chat or build groups.
Signal Chat Capabilities
1 to 1 and Group Messaging: Voice messages, texts, media sharing with reactions and threads using phone numbers or usernames
Voice and Video Calling: End-to-end encryption built-in for both messaging and calls
Profile Verification: Contact identity verification for enhanced security
Common Groups Visibility: Members can see groups they have in common with others
Protected Groups: Admins easily control who joins groups
Signal is excellent for chat and group conversations but lacks large-scale group and broadcasting formats that Telegram offers. There’s no way to publicly discover available groups to join. Very importantly, Signal does not include broadcasting features for communicating with large audiences. It’s best as small group or 1:1 chat but not for communities exceeding 1,000 members.
Telegram’s Approach
Telegram supports text messages, voice and video calls, and file sharing. It hosts huge groups up to 200,000 members. Telegram mixes chat features with broadcasting, so many Telegram communities are built around top-down communication instead of horizontal communities.
Telegram Community Capabilities
Massive Groups: Up to 200,000 members per group, users can join up to 500 groups
Broadcasting Channels: Channel home pages viewable by non-users, admin-only posting
Rich Media: Stickers, GIFs, and file sharing up to 2 gigabytes
Message Scheduling: Plan posts and messages for optimal timing
Username System: Members can use usernames instead of exposing phone numbers
Livestream Support: Channels support livestreams, posts, videos, and podcasts
Telegram is the only option if you want big broadcasts to audiences. So in signal vs telegram comparison for community building, Telegram wins decisively for anyone managing communities over 1,000 members or requiring broadcasting capabilities.
Security & Encryption: Where Signal Dominates
Signal’s Security Foundation
Signal is built with privacy and security as its foundation—the mission behind its very creation by a non-profit. User privacy is paramount here.
Signal Security Features
Default End-to-End Encryption: Encrypted profiles protecting privacy across all communications
No Data Storage: Signal cannot read your messages or see your content
Encrypted Calls: All voice and video calls encrypted with no tracking or third-party sharing
Open Source: Code available on GitHub for public audit
Non-Profit Operation: Run by Signal Foundation, funded by donations and grants with no corporate ownership
Privacy is the default—it’s literally in every element of the platform. Since Signal is open source and non-profit, it’s safe to assume your data will remain protected in the future. Signal’s entire philosophy centers on safety.
Telegram’s Optional Security
Telegram is known for security, but unlike Signal, most security features need manual activation.
Telegram Security Features
Server-Side Encryption: Regular messages stored on servers with server-side encryption
Optional Secret Chats: Not stored on Telegram’s servers when activated
Self-Destructing Messages: Available for sensitive communications
2-Factor Authentication: User control over phone-number visibility
Open APIs – Allow some third-party development
However, the company can read server-stored messages—both 1:1 and group chats. Broadcasts are not end-to-end encrypted. Telegram claims to operate like a non-profit but isn’t technically structured as one. It’s privately funded and owned. Forbes has called it an “accessible dark web” due to frequent regional bans and limited moderation.
Signal vs Telegram Security Winner: Signal is dramatically more secure. It has end-to-end encryption across the entire platform as base setting. Even with Telegram’s encryption tools activated, they aren’t as robust. Plus, Signal is non-profit, therefore having no incentive to store or access your data.
Monetization Capabilities
Signal’s Non-Profit Model
Signal doesn’t have any community monetization features. As a non-profit, obviously the main thrust hasn’t been incorporating payment infrastructure. It’s not built for the kinds of communities or conversations that Telegram hosts. If you wanted to use Signal as part of a digital business, you couldn’t add subscriptions, premium features, or paywalls.
Telegram’s Monetization Tools
Telegram isn’t comprehensive for monetization compared to proper membership platforms, but it offers neat features for channel owners:
Telegram Monetization Options
Ad Revenue Sharing: For channels with 1,000+ subscribers, enable ads and keep 50% of revenue
Sponsored Messages: Enable sponsored messages to your audience
Stars System: Built-in tipping system for unlocking premium content or donations; stars worth approximately $0.13 each
Beyond these options, monetization power is limited. There’s no native subscriptions or payment tiers. You’d need third-party integrations to actually collect money from members.
Signal vs Telegram Monetization Winner: Telegram wins by default as the only platform with any monetization. However, if you’re building a real digital business, proper membership platforms offer superior monetization tools.
User Experience & Customization
Signal’s Minimalist Design
Signal’s design is clean, intuitive, and easy to use.
Signal UX Highlights
· Available for iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, and Linux (requires download and install—no web browser version)
· Simple messaging interface with reactions and replies
· Message status and read receipts
· Basic customization including light/dark mode and some stickers and wallpapers
Telegram’s Feature-Rich Experience
Telegram arguably offers significantly more for UX with extensive customization and expression tools:
Telegram UX Advantages
· Available on iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, and web browsers
· Individual users can customize app look and feel
· Advanced messaging: edit sent messages, schedule messages and media
· Polls for group decision-making
· Add chats to device home screen
Telegram offers dramatically more feature-rich and customizable user experience across multiple platforms. It’s closer to full social media experience, while Signal is functional chat app.
Signal vs Telegram UX Winner: Telegram wins for overall UX and accessibility (including web app), plus extensive customization, stickers, GIFs, and editing capabilities.
The Verdict: Signal vs Telegram Winner
In the end, the signal vs telegram choice comes down to one question: Which is more important to you—privacy or powerful content options?
Signal wins on privacy hands-down, with real encryption and security built through every aspect of the platform. If you’re a privacy advocate, journalist, activist, or anyone handling sensitive communications, Signal is the clear choice.
Telegram wins for overall UX and accessibility (including web app), and a whole range of channel and broadcasting features Signal is missing. If you’re building communities, running channels, or need monetization tools, Telegram is the obvious winner.
For crypto communities specifically, Telegram dominates with 90%+ of projects using it for announcements, alpha sharing, and community building. The channel format, large group capacity, and web accessibility make Telegram the de facto standard for crypto communications despite weaker encryption.
FAQ
Which is more secure, Signal or Telegram?
Signal is dramatically more secure. It uses end-to-end encryption by default for all communications, stores zero user data, and operates as non-profit with no incentive to access information. Telegram requires manual activation of security features and can read server-stored messages.
Can I use Signal or Telegram without sharing my phone number?
Telegram allows username-based communication without exposing phone numbers. Signal requires phone numbers for contact discovery, though recent updates allow username creation for privacy-conscious users. However, Signal’s implementation is more limited than Telegram’s.
Which is better for crypto communities?
Telegram wins decisively for crypto. Over 90% of crypto projects use Telegram for announcements and communities due to channel broadcasting, 200,000-member group capacity, web accessibility, and monetization tools. Signal lacks broadcasting and large group features essential for crypto communities.
Does Signal or Telegram have better group features?
Telegram supports groups up to 200,000 members with channels for unlimited subscribers, while Signal caps groups at 1,000 members. Telegram offers polls, message editing, scheduled posts, and admin controls that Signal lacks. However, Signal provides better privacy for small group conversations.
Can I make money on Signal or Telegram?
Only Telegram offers monetization through ad revenue sharing (50% for channels with 1,000+ subscribers), sponsored messages, and Stars tipping system. Signal has zero monetization features as a non-profit focused solely on secure communications.
Which has better user experience?
Telegram provides richer UX with extensive customization (themes, wallpapers, animated stickers), web browser access, message editing, polls, and GIF integration. Signal offers cleaner, simpler interface but lacks these features. Choose based on whether you prefer simplicity or feature richness.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
Signal vs Telegram: Which Secure Messenger Wins for Privacy & Features?
Signal vs Telegram comparison reveals two philosophies: Signal prioritizes absolute privacy with default end-to-end encryption and zero data storage as a non-profit, while Telegram offers 200,000-member groups, channels, monetization tools, and web access but requires manual encryption activation.
Signal vs Telegram: Quick Overview
Signal is a secure messaging, voice, and video-calling app created by the Signal Foundation, a non-profit organization. Its code is hosted on GitHub as open-source software. Signal prioritizes privacy and security, with encryption by default across the platform and no data stored on Signal’s servers. It serves 900 million users globally who value maximum privacy over feature richness.
Telegram is a cloud-based messaging and chat app popular with online communities and forums. Available for mobile, desktop, and web, Telegram has become one of the world’s most popular apps with 900 million users. It features channel format for growing subscriber bases and broadcasting livestreams, content, videos, and messages to large groups, plus simple built-in monetization tools.
The signal vs telegram choice fundamentally comes down to one question: Which matters more to you—absolute privacy or powerful content and community features?
Chat & Community Features Comparison
Signal’s Approach
Signal is a secure messaging platform growing rapidly. People are drawn to it for private communication options—it mixes good security with user-friendly features making it easy to chat or build groups.
Signal Chat Capabilities
1 to 1 and Group Messaging: Voice messages, texts, media sharing with reactions and threads using phone numbers or usernames
Voice and Video Calling: End-to-end encryption built-in for both messaging and calls
Profile Verification: Contact identity verification for enhanced security
Common Groups Visibility: Members can see groups they have in common with others
Protected Groups: Admins easily control who joins groups
Signal is excellent for chat and group conversations but lacks large-scale group and broadcasting formats that Telegram offers. There’s no way to publicly discover available groups to join. Very importantly, Signal does not include broadcasting features for communicating with large audiences. It’s best as small group or 1:1 chat but not for communities exceeding 1,000 members.
Telegram’s Approach
Telegram supports text messages, voice and video calls, and file sharing. It hosts huge groups up to 200,000 members. Telegram mixes chat features with broadcasting, so many Telegram communities are built around top-down communication instead of horizontal communities.
Telegram Community Capabilities
Massive Groups: Up to 200,000 members per group, users can join up to 500 groups
Broadcasting Channels: Channel home pages viewable by non-users, admin-only posting
Rich Media: Stickers, GIFs, and file sharing up to 2 gigabytes
Message Scheduling: Plan posts and messages for optimal timing
Username System: Members can use usernames instead of exposing phone numbers
Livestream Support: Channels support livestreams, posts, videos, and podcasts
Telegram is the only option if you want big broadcasts to audiences. So in signal vs telegram comparison for community building, Telegram wins decisively for anyone managing communities over 1,000 members or requiring broadcasting capabilities.
Security & Encryption: Where Signal Dominates
Signal’s Security Foundation
Signal is built with privacy and security as its foundation—the mission behind its very creation by a non-profit. User privacy is paramount here.
Signal Security Features
Default End-to-End Encryption: Encrypted profiles protecting privacy across all communications
No Data Storage: Signal cannot read your messages or see your content
Encrypted Calls: All voice and video calls encrypted with no tracking or third-party sharing
Open Source: Code available on GitHub for public audit
Non-Profit Operation: Run by Signal Foundation, funded by donations and grants with no corporate ownership
Privacy is the default—it’s literally in every element of the platform. Since Signal is open source and non-profit, it’s safe to assume your data will remain protected in the future. Signal’s entire philosophy centers on safety.
Telegram’s Optional Security
Telegram is known for security, but unlike Signal, most security features need manual activation.
Telegram Security Features
Server-Side Encryption: Regular messages stored on servers with server-side encryption
Optional Secret Chats: Not stored on Telegram’s servers when activated
Self-Destructing Messages: Available for sensitive communications
2-Factor Authentication: User control over phone-number visibility
Open APIs – Allow some third-party development
However, the company can read server-stored messages—both 1:1 and group chats. Broadcasts are not end-to-end encrypted. Telegram claims to operate like a non-profit but isn’t technically structured as one. It’s privately funded and owned. Forbes has called it an “accessible dark web” due to frequent regional bans and limited moderation.
Signal vs Telegram Security Winner: Signal is dramatically more secure. It has end-to-end encryption across the entire platform as base setting. Even with Telegram’s encryption tools activated, they aren’t as robust. Plus, Signal is non-profit, therefore having no incentive to store or access your data.
Monetization Capabilities
Signal’s Non-Profit Model
Signal doesn’t have any community monetization features. As a non-profit, obviously the main thrust hasn’t been incorporating payment infrastructure. It’s not built for the kinds of communities or conversations that Telegram hosts. If you wanted to use Signal as part of a digital business, you couldn’t add subscriptions, premium features, or paywalls.
Telegram’s Monetization Tools
Telegram isn’t comprehensive for monetization compared to proper membership platforms, but it offers neat features for channel owners:
Telegram Monetization Options
Ad Revenue Sharing: For channels with 1,000+ subscribers, enable ads and keep 50% of revenue
Sponsored Messages: Enable sponsored messages to your audience
Stars System: Built-in tipping system for unlocking premium content or donations; stars worth approximately $0.13 each
Beyond these options, monetization power is limited. There’s no native subscriptions or payment tiers. You’d need third-party integrations to actually collect money from members.
Signal vs Telegram Monetization Winner: Telegram wins by default as the only platform with any monetization. However, if you’re building a real digital business, proper membership platforms offer superior monetization tools.
User Experience & Customization
Signal’s Minimalist Design
Signal’s design is clean, intuitive, and easy to use.
Signal UX Highlights
· Available for iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, and Linux (requires download and install—no web browser version)
· Simple messaging interface with reactions and replies
· Message status and read receipts
· Basic customization including light/dark mode and some stickers and wallpapers
Telegram’s Feature-Rich Experience
Telegram arguably offers significantly more for UX with extensive customization and expression tools:
Telegram UX Advantages
· Available on iOS, Android, Mac, Windows, and web browsers
· Extensive customization: wallpapers, themes, stickers, light/dark mode, channel cover pages
· Built-in GIFs and animated stickers
· Individual users can customize app look and feel
· Advanced messaging: edit sent messages, schedule messages and media
· Polls for group decision-making
· Add chats to device home screen
Telegram offers dramatically more feature-rich and customizable user experience across multiple platforms. It’s closer to full social media experience, while Signal is functional chat app.
Signal vs Telegram UX Winner: Telegram wins for overall UX and accessibility (including web app), plus extensive customization, stickers, GIFs, and editing capabilities.
The Verdict: Signal vs Telegram Winner
In the end, the signal vs telegram choice comes down to one question: Which is more important to you—privacy or powerful content options?
Signal wins on privacy hands-down, with real encryption and security built through every aspect of the platform. If you’re a privacy advocate, journalist, activist, or anyone handling sensitive communications, Signal is the clear choice.
Telegram wins for overall UX and accessibility (including web app), and a whole range of channel and broadcasting features Signal is missing. If you’re building communities, running channels, or need monetization tools, Telegram is the obvious winner.
For crypto communities specifically, Telegram dominates with 90%+ of projects using it for announcements, alpha sharing, and community building. The channel format, large group capacity, and web accessibility make Telegram the de facto standard for crypto communications despite weaker encryption.
FAQ
Which is more secure, Signal or Telegram?
Signal is dramatically more secure. It uses end-to-end encryption by default for all communications, stores zero user data, and operates as non-profit with no incentive to access information. Telegram requires manual activation of security features and can read server-stored messages.
Can I use Signal or Telegram without sharing my phone number?
Telegram allows username-based communication without exposing phone numbers. Signal requires phone numbers for contact discovery, though recent updates allow username creation for privacy-conscious users. However, Signal’s implementation is more limited than Telegram’s.
Which is better for crypto communities?
Telegram wins decisively for crypto. Over 90% of crypto projects use Telegram for announcements and communities due to channel broadcasting, 200,000-member group capacity, web accessibility, and monetization tools. Signal lacks broadcasting and large group features essential for crypto communities.
Does Signal or Telegram have better group features?
Telegram supports groups up to 200,000 members with channels for unlimited subscribers, while Signal caps groups at 1,000 members. Telegram offers polls, message editing, scheduled posts, and admin controls that Signal lacks. However, Signal provides better privacy for small group conversations.
Can I make money on Signal or Telegram?
Only Telegram offers monetization through ad revenue sharing (50% for channels with 1,000+ subscribers), sponsored messages, and Stars tipping system. Signal has zero monetization features as a non-profit focused solely on secure communications.
Which has better user experience?
Telegram provides richer UX with extensive customization (themes, wallpapers, animated stickers), web browser access, message editing, polls, and GIF integration. Signal offers cleaner, simpler interface but lacks these features. Choose based on whether you prefer simplicity or feature richness.