I just looked through a chain transaction that looked like a "coincidental transfer," and I almost instinctively thought it was a random typo in the address... I got a little scared: if I had clicked on that "claim/reclaim" link directly at the time, I would have basically paid tuition.

Looking at the path, it’s actually quite clear: first a small exploratory transfer → a fork in the same relay address → finally converging into a familiar collection point, with two obvious front-running traces inserted along the way.
Recently, everyone has been complaining about validators eating MEV and unfair ordering, which I can understand. When ordinary people see a transaction suddenly being front-run, their first reaction is "Am I being targeted?"
Anyway, when I encounter this kind of "coincidence" now, I first review the authorization, signatures, and interaction history. I’d rather be slow than rely on luck.