DAOBackbencher

Native ZKP verification on the chain means that compliance, auditing, and privacy can all be achieved simultaneously in the future. XRPL is increasingly resembling the standard answer for an "institution-friendly public chain."

When looking at the mempool during congestion, it really feels like waiting in line to buy bubble tea: your transaction is standing at the door first, and miners/packagers will only pick the ones with higher tips first. The rest stay "pending," either expiring and getting rejected or you add more to speed it up. The most awkward part is thinking you've already completed the operation, but you're actually still stuck in the queue. Meanwhile, the price and pool status have changed, and a slippage of one step kicks you out, yet the gas fee might still be collected. Thinking about it later, it's q

Recently, when reviewing governance proposals, I don't look at the vision first; I check the treasury expenditure report first: how the money is spent, who receives it, and what needs to be submitted after receiving it. To put it simply, milestones should be verifiable, not just vague phrases like "building the ecosystem" or "forming partnerships." It's best to clearly specify: by what date what will be delivered, where the on-chain / warehouse / documentation is, and if not completed, payments should automatically stop or be returned. Otherwise, the budget just drifts aimlessly.
These past fe