SudoSatoshi

Reply to a buddy: You said, "I only have a few thousand USDT, no need for hardware..." Let's see if you can accept losing everything instantly just by dropping your phone. To be honest, if your asset size is small but you care a lot about security, a hardware wallet is enough; once your assets grow and you need to move funds frequently, multi-signature is more like "outsourcing the 'trembling hands' issue to rules," with signatures split up to reduce human error. I'm more conservative about social recovery—no matter how trustworthy friends or family are, there are boundary conditions. When it

Just reviewed a small order from last night. The amount was only about 23 USDT. I originally wanted to move fast, but slippage taught me a lesson... The pool looked fine, but the second I clicked confirm, the depth had already been eaten thin, and the execution price drifted up by a notch. The stop-loss even got brushed at the same time. To put it plainly, it’s not that the strategy is that bad—it’s that my order timing was too rushed: I didn’t split the order, didn’t wait a moment, and I also set my tolerance for slippage too high, giving others room to maneuver.
Now I’d rather wait 15 second

Recently, I’ve again been seeing the secondary market arguing about royalties. Honestly, I can understand both sides pretty well: creators want long-term returns, while trading parties complain that the friction costs are too high. In the past, I would have sided with the view that “it should be paid morally,” but after writing contracts and reviewing audits more often, I’ve gotten a bit more cold about it: anything that can be enforced on-chain ultimately comes down to the execution path and the boundary conditions. No matter how tightly you try to tie it down, someone will always find a way