The U.S. Congress promotes the "Promoting Blockchain Development and Innovation Act," proposing to amend Section 1960 to establish a "safe harbor" for open-source developers.

On February 28, U.S. lawmakers from both parties jointly introduced the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” on February 26, aiming to clarify the legal responsibilities of blockchain developers and prevent open-source code authors from being mistakenly classified as remittance institutions. The proposal, led by Scott Fitzgerald, Ben Cline, and Zoe Lofgren, focuses on amending Section 1960 of the U.S. Code to target custodians who control customer assets or execute transfers on behalf of users.

The bill suggests that, amid rising debates over whether “open-source software developers should bear remittance licensing responsibilities” and “legal risks for non-custodial blockchain developers,” clear exemptions should be provided for entities that only write or distribute code. The ongoing lawsuits related to Tornado Cash have further amplified industry concerns about “code as crime.” Ben Cline noted that long-term regulatory expansion blurs the line between malicious actors and technological innovators; Scott Fitzgerald also emphasized that innovators should not face undue law enforcement pressure for developing infrastructure.

Industry support has come from the Solana Institute and the Blockchain Association, which believe the bill will help establish a clear framework distinguishing “open-source developers from custodial financial intermediaries.” Meanwhile, discussions in Washington also include topics like the CLARITY Act and the GENIUS Act. The former, passed by the House in 2025 but with slowed progress, aims to clarify regulations, while the latter enhances stablecoin oversight without expanding developer responsibilities.

Analysts believe that if enacted, the “Promoting Innovation in Blockchain Development Act” will set a precedent for reshaping the U.S. crypto regulatory framework and defining blockchain developers’ compliance boundaries. Ongoing lobbying efforts continue, and the specific wording and scope of the Section 1960 amendments could be a key factor influencing U.S. crypto policy in 2026.

Disclaimer: The information on this page may come from third parties and does not represent the views or opinions of Gate. The content displayed on this page is for reference only and does not constitute any financial, investment, or legal advice. Gate does not guarantee the accuracy or completeness of the information and shall not be liable for any losses arising from the use of this information. Virtual asset investments carry high risks and are subject to significant price volatility. You may lose all of your invested principal. Please fully understand the relevant risks and make prudent decisions based on your own financial situation and risk tolerance. For details, please refer to Disclaimer.

Related Articles

US Sanctions Iran-Linked Crypto Wallets; Tether Freezes $344M USDT in Coordination with OFAC

Gate News message, April 25 — The U.S. Treasury Department sanctioned multiple cryptocurrency wallets linked to Iran on April 24 as part of efforts to increase economic pressure on the country amid an ongoing ceasefire. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said the government will "follow the money

GateNews19m ago

Clarity Act Faces May 2026 Deadline Amid Banking Lobby Pushback on Stablecoin Yield Ban

Gate News message, April 25 — The Clarity Act, a key U.S. crypto regulatory bill, faces mounting pressure as Senator Thom Tillis recommended delaying the Senate Banking Committee markup to May 2026, citing intense lobbying from the North Carolina Bankers Association (NCBA). The NCBA is pushing for a

GateNews54m ago

Brazil fully bans 27 prediction market platforms such as Polymarket and Kalshi: the largest prediction market ban in emerging markets

The Brazilian government announced a comprehensive ban on 27 prediction market platforms (including Polymarket and Kalshi) on April 24, 2026, citing that they had not obtained licenses and did not comply with the current gambling laws, and that connections were blocked from that day onward. The new law only allows fixed-odds betting based on the results of in-person sporting events; event-based prediction contracts remain illegal. The central bank also added that the regulatory threshold for derivative transactions had not been met. This move has been seen as the first major negative case in the expansion of emerging markets worldwide, and in the future it may affect regulatory and cross-border compliance negotiations in places such as India, Indonesia, and Turkey.

ChainNewsAbmedia1h ago

Brazil Bans Polymarket, Kalshi Citing Investor Protections

Brazil has enacted a sweeping ban on prediction markets and betting platforms, according to local media and government filings. The two leading prediction markets, Polymarket and Kalshi, were inaccessible to researchers in the country. Finance Minister Dario Durigan stated that approximately 28 plat

CryptoFrontier3h ago

DeFi Education Fund Urges SEC to Formalize DeFi Broker Guidance into Rulemaking

Gate News message, April 25 — The DeFi Education Fund and 35 other crypto industry leaders are urging the Securities and Exchange Commission to formalize its recent decentralized finance interface guidance into formal rulemaking. In a letter sent to the SEC this week, the groups pressed the agency t

GateNews3h ago

Tennessee Bans Crypto ATMs Statewide, Becomes Second U.S. State After Indiana

Gate News message, April 25 — Tennessee became the second U.S. state to enact a statewide ban on cryptocurrency ATMs after Gov. Bill Lee signed House Bill 2505 into law on April 13. The law, which officially took effect on April 24, will become enforceable on July 1 and makes it a Class A

GateNews4h ago
Comment
0/400
No comments