The SEC has completed its review of the information disclosure of CEX, and the final result is that no modifications are required.

GateUser-6433627c · 2025-04-15T23:59:22+00:00

The U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) completed a review of CEX disclosures after more than two years and did not require amendments. CEX's chief legal officer confirmed the news, and the SEC conducted a review of the company's Form 10-K filings, but did not specifically endorse them. The end of the review marks the official end of the review process that has been in place since the listing in 2021.

GateUser-6433627c

2025-04-15 23:59:22

Abstract generation in progress

On April 16, according to Cryptoslate, the SEC completed its review of CEX’s information disclosure, which took more than two years and resulted in no modifications needed. A letter from CEX’s Chief Legal Officer Paul Grewal confirmed this news, stating that the SEC has completed its review of CEX’s 10-K filings for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2022, and 2023. The SEC emphasized that the completion of the review does not equate to approval or endorsement of the documents. This conclusion of the review marks the official end of the lengthy comment process that began shortly after CEX’s listing in April 2021.

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

Reward
like
2
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

GateUser-2a657d3f

· 2025-04-16 01:00

Charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge, charge

View OriginalReply0

TianyiIsHardToDisobe

· 2025-04-16 00:08

Charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge charge

View OriginalReply0