The October PCE data has been delayed again. To put it simply, the statistical system is still being patched. The market was originally counting on this report to bet on the policy direction for December, but now this lead is gone, and we can only dig through the speeches of Fed officials to find clues.
Last Friday, New York Fed's Williams suddenly made a statement that directly reversed the expectation of "no cuts" with just one sentence. This person is not an ordinary board member; what he says can influence the final decision. On the same day, the Fed's second-in-command, Jefferson, also stepped forward to express his stance: this wave of AI is not the same as the internet bubble of the 1990s, and the door to rate cuts is not closed.
These two people spoke one after the other, basically reflecting Powell's meaning. There are really only these three who can make decisions within the Fed; the statements from other committee members are more about posturing and won't change the overall direction. So the probability of a rate cut in December is clearly on the rise now.
What about the statements from the regional Fed chairmen and ordinary board members these days? Those are just icing on the cake. What really changed the expectations were those two big shots last Friday. At this rate, the rate cut trading might have to be speculated until early December before it cools down.
How will the meeting in December play out? I guess a few possibilities:
The first and most reliable approach is to lower rates, but the attitude needs to be a bit firmer. The vote will pass, but the opposing votes are likely to be more than in October, so Powell won't be too dovish at the press conference; it will be more like "conditional lowering."
Second, the dot plot is the main event. The forecast given in the September version was that there would only be one rate cut in 2026. If in December they raise the number of rate cuts for next year to more than two, it would provide a reassurance to the market and counterbalance the cautious tone in Powell's speech.
Third, will the schedule for expanding the balance sheet or purchasing bonds be leaked in advance? It's entirely possible to announce it in December, and if so, it would be overall dovish.
Fourth, what truly affects the market after the meeting is actually the data from November.
The ideal combination is clear: a slight rise in the unemployment rate, continued weakness in new job creation, and inflation below expectations. This is the trifecta that the market longs for, while other combinations tend to be bearish.
Fifth, looking further ahead, it’s about the new chairman candidate. This matter will become the most overlooked variable in next year's policy direction.
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
23 Likes
Reward
23
8
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
PseudoIntellectual
· 11-25 18:42
Williams' operation directly changed the rules of the game. With these two pros working together, the market has to listen to them.
View OriginalReply0
AltcoinMarathoner
· 11-25 07:52
nah, this is just mile 20 energy. fed officials doing their usual dance before december... zoom out though, the macro setup's getting interesting fr
Reply0
RumbleValidator
· 11-25 07:52
Data missing relies on officials' rhetoric for reverse deduction; I have seen this trap too many times in node validation. The key still lies in the weight of Williams and Jefferson's votes—only these few validating nodes can actually change the consensus, while other noise can be ignored.
View OriginalReply0
OnlyUpOnly
· 11-25 07:52
When the data jumps, officials have to be grilled for their statements, this trap is really tiring. However, those two sentences from Williams did indeed revitalize the situation; the reversal of interest rate cut expectations is quite interesting.
View OriginalReply0
GasWaster
· 11-25 07:48
lol fed's just moving the goalposts while our txs keep failing... williams & jefferson do the talking, powell does the math, rest of us just watch the gwei chart go brrr
Reply0
MEVHunterNoLoss
· 11-25 07:43
Williams' words indeed turned, it's certain that there will be a rate cut in December.
View OriginalReply0
RugResistant
· 11-25 07:33
nah the pcE delay is sus... fed's literally patching code in real-time lol
Reply0
ser_ngmi
· 11-25 07:26
Another delay, the Fed really knows how to stir things up, they can't even get the data out but still want to influence the market.
When Williams and Jefferson speak, rate cuts are a done deal, don't pay attention to what others say.
I'm interested in the dot plot, can we see two rate cuts next year? That would be the real confidence booster.
Unemployment rate, employment, inflation, these three need to come together for the market to go high, everything else is meaningless.
New chair, the variables are too large, it's hard to say it won't rewrite the entire script for next year.
The October PCE data has been delayed again. To put it simply, the statistical system is still being patched. The market was originally counting on this report to bet on the policy direction for December, but now this lead is gone, and we can only dig through the speeches of Fed officials to find clues.
Last Friday, New York Fed's Williams suddenly made a statement that directly reversed the expectation of "no cuts" with just one sentence. This person is not an ordinary board member; what he says can influence the final decision. On the same day, the Fed's second-in-command, Jefferson, also stepped forward to express his stance: this wave of AI is not the same as the internet bubble of the 1990s, and the door to rate cuts is not closed.
These two people spoke one after the other, basically reflecting Powell's meaning. There are really only these three who can make decisions within the Fed; the statements from other committee members are more about posturing and won't change the overall direction. So the probability of a rate cut in December is clearly on the rise now.
What about the statements from the regional Fed chairmen and ordinary board members these days? Those are just icing on the cake. What really changed the expectations were those two big shots last Friday. At this rate, the rate cut trading might have to be speculated until early December before it cools down.
How will the meeting in December play out? I guess a few possibilities:
The first and most reliable approach is to lower rates, but the attitude needs to be a bit firmer. The vote will pass, but the opposing votes are likely to be more than in October, so Powell won't be too dovish at the press conference; it will be more like "conditional lowering."
Second, the dot plot is the main event. The forecast given in the September version was that there would only be one rate cut in 2026. If in December they raise the number of rate cuts for next year to more than two, it would provide a reassurance to the market and counterbalance the cautious tone in Powell's speech.
Third, will the schedule for expanding the balance sheet or purchasing bonds be leaked in advance? It's entirely possible to announce it in December, and if so, it would be overall dovish.
Fourth, what truly affects the market after the meeting is actually the data from November.
The ideal combination is clear: a slight rise in the unemployment rate, continued weakness in new job creation, and inflation below expectations. This is the trifecta that the market longs for, while other combinations tend to be bearish.
Fifth, looking further ahead, it’s about the new chairman candidate. This matter will become the most overlooked variable in next year's policy direction.