Vitalik Buterin Warns Zcash Against Token-Based Governance as ZEC Price Slides

Source: ETHNews Original Title: Vitalik Buterin Warns Zcash Against Token-Based Governance as ZEC Price Slides Original Link: Zcash is coming under fresh scrutiny after Ethereum co-founder Vitalik Buterin urged the project to avoid adopting token-based governance, a model he believes would weaken Zcash’s core mission of protecting privacy.

His comments arrive at a time when ZEC is already struggling on the charts, falling steadily throughout the last week.

ZEC Price Weakens Ahead of Governance Debate

Zcash has been trending lower, with the latest TradingView chart showing a sustained decline from above $520 to around $447, reflecting cooling market sentiment. Volumes remain modest, suggesting a lack of strong buyer conviction as uncertainty builds around the project’s long-term direction.

Vitalik: “Token Voting Is Worse Than Zcash’s Status Quo”

In a direct message on X, Vitalik warned the Zcash community that token-holder voting could severely erode the project’s most important principle, privacy.

He argued that governance decisions made by the “median token holder” risk drifting away from Zcash’s founding values. According to Vitalik, token voting:

• Does not protect minority interests
• Is easily influenced by whales
• Creates incentives that are misaligned with privacy-focused ecosystems

He stated bluntly that token voting is “the dark hand” that could weaken Zcash permanently, calling it worse than the project’s current governance setup.

I hope Zcash resists the dark hand of token voting.

Token voting is bad in all kinds of ways; I think it’s worse than Zcash’s status quo.

Privacy is exactly the sort of thing that will erode over time if left to the median token holder.

Privacy at the Core of the Debate

Vitalik emphasized that privacy, unlike parameters such as chain fees or treasury allocations, is particularly vulnerable under token-based governance. If protocol choices depend on whichever token holders show up to vote, he believes Zcash risks slow erosion through majority-rule decisions that do not prioritize long-term privacy integrity.

This places Zcash in a complicated position: balancing community involvement with the need to safeguard a mission that requires stronger constraints than typical DAO structures.

What Comes Next for Zcash?

The ZEC price downtrend shows that the market is already cautious. Governance uncertainty, combined with Zcash’s ongoing struggle with user adoption and exchange liquidity, creates pressure at a time when other privacy-related narratives are heating up.

Vitalik’s comments may influence the community’s upcoming discussions, and possibly slow or halt any shift toward token-based voting. For now, Zcash finds itself facing both ideological and market challenges, with its next governance steps likely to shape sentiment for weeks to come.