2025-12-02 04:21:03

#美联储恢复降息进程 Is the market really seeing through it now?

Don't rush to conclusions. A leading platform recently destroyed 6837.99 tokens in fees — this action is not simple.

Many people are still focused on K-line fluctuations and on-chain transfers? The practical operation aspect has already changed drastically. The platform's intervention in market making and ecological feedback has shifted the dynamics, which is no longer something the project team can control. This is a chip game at the exchange level.

6837 digital tokens may seem unremarkable. But have you calculated it? Nearly 230 tokens are permanently eliminated on average daily—the circulating chips in the market are decreasing every day, with no new selling pressure, only continuous loss.

More substantial than any announcement of a buyback, more persuasive than any statement.

Now the whole internet is still mocking "the last gasp of altcoins." But if you look back, how was DOGE criticized back then? How many people believed in it before WIF launched?

The golden dog has always grown from the sound of skepticism.

Only when the main bullish wave hits can you ask "Why didn't I enter earlier?" Then you can only be a spectator. When the market is in panic, it is precisely the window period for the redistribution of chips.

GIGGLE-4.37%

DOGE-5.37%

WIF-4.14%

View Original

This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.

18 Likes

Reward
18
7
Repost
Share

Comment

0/400

EyeOfTheTokenStorm

· 12-04 23:04

I've looked at the quantitative data on the burn activity. An average of 230 tokens being taken out of circulation per day does indeed change the supply curve. But to be honest, this whole thing is mainly being orchestrated by the exchanges—don't be fooled by the numbers being disclosed. Wait a minute, have you calculated where this thing sits in the macro cycle? With the Fed's rate cut window and token attrition, from a historical perspective, it does look a bit like the signals from 2017... But I have to say, the risks of entering now are still pretty high. Ha, yet another "why didn't I get in earlier" story. I figured it out with DOGE—that the people who really make money are the ones who dare to buy during panic. The question is, do you dare? To put it plainly, the 6,837 tokens burned might sound professional, but in reality it's just a psychological game on the supply side. From a quantitative perspective, the circulating supply is shrinking, but that doesn't necessarily mean the price will go up—just a heads up about the risks. Talking about altcoins making a comeback again? In my opinion, instead of focusing on announcements and burns, it's better to watch where institutions are moving. On-chain data tells the real story—everything else is just narrative. I've seen this kind of cycle many times... Exchanges hype things up, retail piles in, institutions cash out, and then everything falls apart. Don't be fooled by this "token game" narrative—the ones left holding the bag are always the retail investors.

View OriginalReply0

ThatsNotARugPull

· 12-04 07:57

The trick of burning fees is all too common; the key is whether there will be real demand to support it later. However, an average of 230 coins exiting per day is indeed interesting—now it's a question of whether the exchange is genuinely supporting the price or just playing games again.

View OriginalReply0

PumpDetector

· 12-03 16:37

ngl the 230 daily burn math hits different... everyone's obsessing over chart patterns while the actual accumulation mechanics shifted three levels deep. classic.

Reply0

SandwichVictim

· 12-02 04:50

Burning 6837 pieces is indeed something, but can this change market perception? It still depends on the subsequent rhythm. Wait a minute, isn't your logic reversed—doesn't the burning transaction fee rather indicate that the project party is trying to bail-in? Another DOGE copy-paste, can the golden dog really turn things around? I have my doubts. The average daily burn is 230 pieces, I calculated this number, it sounds like a story. I've heard the term "main rise" too many times, every time they say this is the bottom, yet it still continues to fall.

View OriginalReply0

Rugman_Walking

· 12-02 04:49

The trick of burning chips is too old, can it still fool people? --- Wait, an average of 230 coins permanently out of circulation daily, that does have some substance. --- Here comes another DOGE story, can it be replicated this time? To be honest, I don't believe it. --- Can market making on the platform save this coin? I think it's unlikely. --- A chip game is just a chip game, don't package it so high-end. --- Market panic window period? Dude, this phrase sounds too familiar. --- 6837 coins lost sounds fierce, but with such a large circulating supply, can it really make an impact? --- At that time no one believed in DOGE, now blowing up GIGGLE feels similar. --- I agree it's more convincing than buybacks, but let's not be too optimistic. --- There are too many coins sprouting from doubts, how many can survive?

View OriginalReply0

MEVSandwich

· 12-02 04:40

The operation of burning coins is indeed quietly changing the landscape, while others are still arguing about Candlestick patterns, we've already moved on to a higher level game. The story of DOGE WIF is right here; coins that are often criticized tend to be the dark horses. Wait, isn't this logic a bit too perfect? Speaking of which, in the game of chips, someone has to catch a falling knife. An average of 230 coins exiting daily, wow, this rate of loss is indeed significant. Is it still too early to enter? Feels like the panic phase has just begun, bro. To be honest, compared to those official announcements that are all about boasting, the data on burning coins can tell us much more. Is this wave just another carefully crafted narrative? But... it seems hard to completely not believe.

View OriginalReply0

TooScaredToSell

· 12-02 04:34

The idea of burning is correct, but can 6837 coins really change anything? I still can't bring myself to hodl. Wait, this logic has issues. The platform's market-making has nothing to do with the project party? Who knows. DOGE was indeed criticized harshly back then, but looking back it still makes me laugh, yet can GIGGLE have that kind of fate? An average daily loss of 230 coins sounds like a lot, but how many are still in the market? It seems this calculation hasn't been figured out. When will the main rise come? I'm about to fall asleep waiting. It sounds as if it’s true, but when the market panics, that's often when it falls the hardest, not when you pick up cheap deals. I've heard this logic too many times. Every time there's talk of an opportunity coming, and what happens? I don’t deny that burning is favourable information, but who still believes in this kind of rhetoric nowadays? If one really saw through it, they wouldn’t still be struggling at the bottom now.

View OriginalReply0

Trending TopicsView More
#JoinGrowthPointsDrawToWiniPhone17
270.76K Popularity
#DecemberMarketOutlook
69.3K Popularity
#PostonSquaretoEarn$50
9.01K Popularity
#LINKETFToLaunch
9.1K Popularity
#SharingMy100xToken
10.82K Popularity

Hot Gate FunView More

1
minerminer
MC:$3.5KHolders:1
0.00%
2
HCGHCG
MC:$3.51KHolders:2
0.09%
3
8888888open the door
MC:$3.47KHolders:1
0.00%
4
GG3GG3
MC:$3.52KHolders:2
0.00%
5
GAMEDGAMED
MC:$3.51KHolders:1
0.00%

Sitemap