In the past two days, the market has been rebounding amidst fluctuations, but I'm still holding onto my positions tightly.
There's still quite a gap between the current price and my preset short entry point, and as for a true reversal signal? That's even further away.
Today, I want to talk about why I’m increasingly leaning toward right-side trading and trend-following strategies.
In the game of trading, you can't avoid this choice: do you catch the bottom and go for a rebound, or do you wait for confirmation before entering?
Let’s start with left-side trading—it’s like trying to catch a falling knife before it hits the ground. If you catch it steadily, congrats, you bought at the floor price and look like a genius; but more often, the blade slices your hand, a bloody reminder of what it means to "catch a falling knife."
Now, let’s look at right-side trading: you stand aside, watch the knife drop to the floor, bounce a few times, and only after it comes to a complete stop and you’re sure it’s safe, you bend down to pick it up. Sure, the knife is a little higher than when it first hit the ground, but your fingers are intact—that’s the margin of safety with right-side trading.
The core logic of right-side trading is straightforward: I don't bet on what the future will bring; I only trust what has already happened. When Bitcoin breaks above a downtrend line and starts to climb steadily, we enter on the right half of the "V" shape.
But here's the question—why is it that once BTC breaks through a key price level, it's highly likely to keep rising afterward?
It’s not mystical; it’s determined by market structure. After a breakout, there are two forces "forced" to push you higher:
**First, the area above the resistance is a vacuum zone.** There’s no historical high-volume trading area up there, and very few people are willing to sell at those prices. So after a breakout, even a small amount of buying can easily push prices higher. This kind of "resistance-free rally" is like a flood bursting through a dike—there’s nothing left to stop it, and the momentum naturally gets released to the fullest.
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
12 Likes
Reward
12
6
Repost
Share
Comment
0/400
NFTBlackHole
· 12-04 13:30
Holding on tightly—I can understand that. But aren’t you worried about being shaken out by volatility?
Right-side trading sounds stable, but I feel like you end up missing out on a lot of gains.
The “catching a falling knife” analogy is spot on—bloody lessons learned.
I believe in the idea of Bitcoin breaking through resistance and then rising without obstacles, but how long can that vacuum last?
Fingers remain intact, but so do the profits—that’s exactly what I’m torn about.
Since the trend is confirmed, just follow it. Why keep stressing about left or right side trading?
How far can this rebound go? Give me a number, bro.
The logic is solid, but when it comes to execution, greed is always the first issue.
Unimpeded price increases rely on the “carry-the-sedan-chair” mechanism, but what about selling pressure? There’s always someone looking to dump.
It might seem steady, but you’re still gambling—just betting that what’s already happened will continue.
View OriginalReply0
GweiTooHigh
· 12-04 06:46
Right-side trading is steady; trying to catch falling knives is really stupid.
Hold your position and wait for confirmation—that's the real way to make money.
So what if the market rebounds? If the trend hasn't reversed, keep a bearish outlook and stick to doing the right thing.
Bottom fishing is pure gambling; I've long lost interest in it. Following the trend feels much better.
The logic behind breaking through a vacuum zone is indeed solid, but you have to see if the volume supports it.
Left-side trading is just burning money; right-side trading is the grown-up way.
Only believe in what has already happened—that's been my iron rule for trading lately.
Unimpeded rallies sound great, but proper pullback protection is key.
The short entry is still far off. I'm not in a hurry—let time teach them a lesson.
Until a reversal signal appears, everything else is just noise—hold tight and don't let go.
View OriginalReply0
GasFeeNightmare
· 12-04 02:54
Hold the position and wait for confirmation signals... I'm familiar with this method, but it requires patience. Right-side trading sounds nice, but in reality, it's like watching others eat meat while you only get the soup. Still, it's better to play it safe than to chase those late-night rebounds when gas fees are soaring.
View OriginalReply0
FUD_Vaccinated
· 12-04 02:51
Holding on tight, huh? Looks like you're betting the rebound won't come so soon—pretty gutsy.
I've heard the "right-side trading" approach so many times, but very few people can actually stick with it.
Price breakouts always mean rallies? Ha, then why are so many people still stuck in losing positions?
That "fingers intact" metaphor is spot on, but are we really sure this rebound is confirmed?
Only believing in what's already happened and not betting on the future—easy to say, tough to do, man.
Judging by your determination to hold, you probably lost quite a bit this time, huh?
View OriginalReply0
SignatureVerifier
· 12-04 02:48
ngl, the whole "catching the falling knife" metaphor hits different when you're actually bleeding out. insufficient validation of entry points = statistically improbable gains, technically speaking.
Reply0
ProxyCollector
· 12-04 02:26
Holding tight onto the position, I get this approach now—none of that fake bottom-fishing.
Wait for confirmation before getting in. It might be a bit late, but at least you won’t get rekt.
In the past two days, the market has been rebounding amidst fluctuations, but I'm still holding onto my positions tightly.
There's still quite a gap between the current price and my preset short entry point, and as for a true reversal signal? That's even further away.
Today, I want to talk about why I’m increasingly leaning toward right-side trading and trend-following strategies.
In the game of trading, you can't avoid this choice: do you catch the bottom and go for a rebound, or do you wait for confirmation before entering?
Let’s start with left-side trading—it’s like trying to catch a falling knife before it hits the ground. If you catch it steadily, congrats, you bought at the floor price and look like a genius; but more often, the blade slices your hand, a bloody reminder of what it means to "catch a falling knife."
Now, let’s look at right-side trading: you stand aside, watch the knife drop to the floor, bounce a few times, and only after it comes to a complete stop and you’re sure it’s safe, you bend down to pick it up. Sure, the knife is a little higher than when it first hit the ground, but your fingers are intact—that’s the margin of safety with right-side trading.
The core logic of right-side trading is straightforward: I don't bet on what the future will bring; I only trust what has already happened. When Bitcoin breaks above a downtrend line and starts to climb steadily, we enter on the right half of the "V" shape.
But here's the question—why is it that once BTC breaks through a key price level, it's highly likely to keep rising afterward?
It’s not mystical; it’s determined by market structure. After a breakout, there are two forces "forced" to push you higher:
**First, the area above the resistance is a vacuum zone.** There’s no historical high-volume trading area up there, and very few people are willing to sell at those prices. So after a breakout, even a small amount of buying can easily push prices higher. This kind of "resistance-free rally" is like a flood bursting through a dike—there’s nothing left to stop it, and the momentum naturally gets released to the fullest.