#ETH走势分析 $BDXN This short position was incredibly satisfying! Watched it drop all the way from 0.11842 to 0.02715, netting a 130x return, with the price plunging over 70%💥



Why was I confident to go heavy on the short? Three clear signals:

**Capital Flows:** After the pump, there was no one left to take over the buying—classic distribution pattern. On-chain data showed a huge spike in net outflows, with big players switching from accumulation to selling. The direction was crystal clear.

**Technical Analysis:** That fake breakout above 0.11 was an obvious red flag—the trading volume just couldn’t support it. Once support was broken, price dropped straight to the lower edge of the range, and the bearish trend was instantly confirmed.

**Market Structure:** The earlier sharp rally lacked strong support. Moves like that are almost always bull traps. I decisively shorted at 0.11842, catching the last exit pump from the big players.

What does 130x mean? A $1,000 principal instantly became $130,000.

Opportunities are never lacking in crypto—the only thing missing is the insight to spot them and the guts to act. Once a trend forms, riding it is the simplest way to make money.
ETH-3.77%
BDXN-15.79%
View Original
This page may contain third-party content, which is provided for information purposes only (not representations/warranties) and should not be considered as an endorsement of its views by Gate, nor as financial or professional advice. See Disclaimer for details.
  • Reward
  • 6
  • Repost
  • Share
Comment
0/400
ValidatorVikingvip
· 3h ago
nah this reeks of survivorship bias... sure the short worked out but what's the slashing risk on your actual conviction here? volume tells a different story than your on-chain narrative tbh
Reply0
NftBankruptcyClubvip
· 12-04 03:51
Wow, this move is really intense. 130x leverage is definitely a bold play, but I still think luck played a major role here.
View OriginalReply0
MoneyBurnerSocietyvip
· 12-04 03:48
Uh... yet another perfect post-mortem story, why didn’t I get it?
View OriginalReply0
YieldHuntervip
· 12-04 03:41
ngl this screams survivorship bias to me... like yeah 130x sounds insane but technically speaking if you look at the data on how many shorts got liquidated on this exact move, the risk-adjusted metrics don't really check out. sustainable returns come from actual thesis, not just chasing degens who got lucky
Reply0
GreenCandleCollectorvip
· 12-04 03:39
Yeah, this move is definitely ruthless, but I still think these dozens-of-times short positions are ridiculously risky and too hard to gauge.
View OriginalReply0
AirdropSkepticvip
· 12-04 03:23
Oops, this move is indeed ruthless, but why do I feel like it's another case of hindsight analysis?
View OriginalReply0
  • Pin
Trade Crypto Anywhere Anytime
qrCode
Scan to download Gate App
Community
  • 简体中文
  • English
  • Tiếng Việt
  • 繁體中文
  • Español
  • Русский
  • Français (Afrique)
  • Português (Portugal)
  • Bahasa Indonesia
  • 日本語
  • بالعربية
  • Українська
  • Português (Brasil)